On 9/28/10 11:47 , Francis Galiegue wrote:
As to file system hardening, what do you mean apart from checksums?
Fundamental filesystem design?
I specifically mean the intended ability to survive a power failure.
Historically, unix file systems lived in the disk cache such that a
power failure
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:27:57AM -0400, Francis Galiegue wrote:
> Here is a preview of the survey.
Very nice.
Question #2 might benefit from a "I only use btrfs for testing purposes"
might be useful. Possibly even with a comment?
- Kristian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 21:27, cwillu wrote:
> Question 16 needs an "other" option, or some elaboration (I've had
> things fixed via tool patches from developers).
>
Yes, I thought about this and forgot to add this answer. Fixed!
--
Francis Galiegue, fgalie...@gmail.com
"It seems obvious [...]
Question 16 needs an "other" option, or some elaboration (I've had
things fixed via tool patches from developers).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordom
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 21:18, Andreas Philipp
wrote:
[...]
> In the question about the features one is using day by day on the last
> page "Multiple device (RAID)" is listed twice.
Noticed, and fixed that. It's a bug with surveygizmo, in fact.
> Everything else looks really nice.
>
Thanks!
Wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.09.2010 21:00, Francis Galiegue wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 16:27, Francis Galiegue
wrote:
>> Here is a preview of the survey.
>>
>> I have not included *all* feature requests yet, otherwise it wouldn't
fit on a screen :), but I think I h
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 16:27, Francis Galiegue wrote:
> Here is a preview of the survey.
>
> I have not included *all* feature requests yet, otherwise it wouldn't fit on
> a screen :), but I think I have chosen the most important ones.
>
> Please comment!
>
> Click on the following link to test
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 19:48, Freddie Cash wrote:
> So far, very nice. Some comments inline below.
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Francis Galiegue wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 16:57, David Pottage
>> wrote:
>>> On 28/09/10 15:27, Francis Galiegue wrote:
Here is a preview
[cc: list]
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 17:26, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
> #2 needs an answer dealing with "stability". Unstable doesn't necessarily
> mean polluted file systems. It can also mean pathological behavior, kernel
> crashes, etc.
>
Yes, indeed. Fixed.
> #4 needs an answer that involves
So far, very nice. Some comments inline below.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Francis Galiegue wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 16:57, David Pottage wrote:
>> On 28/09/10 15:27, Francis Galiegue wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is a preview of the survey.
>>>
>>> I have not included *all* feature requests
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 16:57, David Pottage wrote:
> On 28/09/10 15:27, Francis Galiegue wrote:
>>
>> Here is a preview of the survey.
>>
>> I have not included *all* feature requests yet, otherwise it wouldn't fit
>> on a screen :), but I think I have chosen the most important ones.
>>
>> Please
On 28/09/10 15:27, Francis Galiegue wrote:
Here is a preview of the survey.
I have not included *all* feature requests yet, otherwise it wouldn't fit on a
screen :), but I think I have chosen the most important ones.
Please comment!
Click on the following link to test this survey:
http://appv
12 matches
Mail list logo
