Hi,
a few more fixes and enhancements: check and restore subcommands,
support for send mode NO_FILE_DATA and partial "libifying".
The libify patchset porting was not straightforward (based on old sources) and
I fixed it here up to my satisfaction. The changes were mostly small but there
was quit
Hi,
documentation updates, mkfs support of extended refs (aka more hardlinks
possible), new command 'subvolume show' and extensions/updates to
the 'subvolume list' command and fsck fixes.
Please consider this more like a preview, there were some merge
conflicts and I may have missed some combinat
Hi David,
I really have concerns about the libification, in particular this commit:
6fc8b21 btrfs-progs: libify some parts of btrfs-progs
The relevant snippets that concern me below:
+libbtrfs_headers = send-stream.h send-utils.h send.h rbtree.h btrfs-list.h \
+ crc32c.h list.h ker
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:35:31PM -0800, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I really have concerns about the libification, in particular this commit:
>
> 6fc8b21 btrfs-progs: libify some parts of btrfs-progs
>
> The relevant snippets that concern me below:
>
> +libbtrfs_headers = send
Hi Mark,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:35:31PM -0800, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>> Another reason of my concerns is that I've been trying to work on
>> exporting the equivalent of ioctl.h, with the constants and structs
>> needed to call btrfs-
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:35:31PM -0800, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> I really have concerns about the libification, in particular this commit:
>
> 6fc8b21 btrfs-progs: libify some parts of btrfs-progs
[...]
> I really don't think that all those headers should be exposed to the
> userspace.
>
Hi,
a set of updates and fixes, plus two libify patches left out for
now (*):
btrfs-progs: libify some parts of btrfs-progs
btrfs-progs: don't link binaries to a dynamic library
* http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg22293.html
In the near-todo are the label patches as the
Hi,
this time it's the label set/get patches to match ioctl added into
3.9-pre, the initial libify support and small fixes recently sent to the
mailinglist.
git://repo.or.cz/btrfs-progs-unstable/devel.git integration-20130227
For those who haven't noticed, the previous integration branch has
Hi Chris,
please pull this integration branch
git://repo.or.cz/btrfs-progs-unstable/devel.git integration-20130227
so far no problems reported (which may also mean that nobody is using
it), worked in my test setups and I've tested the label get/set patches
specifically.
thanks,
david
On We
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 06:41:11PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> I'm going to do some more testing of the previous integration branch and
> send a pull request as of 20130126.
I didn't have that much time for testing as I wanted, at least did
another review round of the pending patchset. Please pul
10 matches
Mail list logo