Am Tue, 13 Sep 2016 04:07:37 + (UTC)
schrieb Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>:
> Kai Krakow posted on Tue, 13 Sep 2016 00:21:10 +0200 as excerpted:
>
> > Am Sun, 21 Aug 2016 02:19:33 + (UTC)
> > schrieb Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>:
> >
> >> Chris Murphy posted on Sat, 20 Aug 2016 18:36:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Sun, 21 Aug 2016 02:19:33 + (UTC)
> schrieb Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>:
>
>> Chris Murphy posted on Sat, 20 Aug 2016 18:36:21 -0600 as excerpted:
>>
>> > FAT leaves a lot to be desired but it's pretty universally
>> > supported and alm
Kai Krakow posted on Tue, 13 Sep 2016 00:21:10 +0200 as excerpted:
> Am Sun, 21 Aug 2016 02:19:33 + (UTC)
> schrieb Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>:
>
>> Chris Murphy posted on Sat, 20 Aug 2016 18:36:21 -0600 as excerpted:
>>
>> > FAT leaves a lot to be desired but it's pretty universally supp
Am Sun, 21 Aug 2016 02:19:33 + (UTC)
schrieb Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>:
> Chris Murphy posted on Sat, 20 Aug 2016 18:36:21 -0600 as excerpted:
>
> > FAT leaves a lot to be desired but it's pretty universally
> > supported and almost trivial to repair *if* the volume is
> > repairable in t
Thanks for the responses all. I'm on Gentoo as well for what that
matters. I think what i'm going to do (if i don't abandon EFI
entirely) is just to get a small (16gb), $25 m.2 since my board
supports that, and use that as my boot drive. Then mkfs other all
discs to be partitionless and away i go.
Chris Murphy posted on Sat, 20 Aug 2016 18:36:21 -0600 as excerpted:
> FAT leaves a lot to be desired but it's pretty universally supported and
> almost trivial to repair *if* the volume is repairable in the first
> place. The much bigger issue with ESP on Linux is this neurotic tendency
> of dist
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
>
> On 08/20/2016 05:21 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Bearcat Şándor
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a btrfs non-raid file system that i'd like to convert to
>>> raid10. This single device has my efi boot partion o
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>If you
> deleted this udev rule, you run the risk of some boots sometimes
> having a slightly delayed drive becoming available and the volume
> wrongly being mounted degraded when it's not necessary.
Yuck. Revision time!
If you were to delet
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Bearcat Şándor
wrote:
> I have a btrfs non-raid file system that i'd like to convert to
> raid10. This single device has my efi boot partion on it, so it's
> partitioned into sda1 and sda2. I have 3 other discs (sdc-sde) that
> i'd like to make partition-less syst
Bearcat Şándor posted on Fri, 19 Aug 2016 22:00:17 -0600 as excerpted:
> I have a btrfs non-raid file system that i'd like to convert to raid10.
> This single device has my efi boot partion on it, so it's partitioned
> into sda1 and sda2. I have 3 other discs (sdc-sde) that i'd like to make
> part
20.08.2016 07:00, Bearcat Şándor пишет:
> I have a btrfs non-raid file system that i'd like to convert to
> raid10. This single device has my efi boot partion on it, so it's
> partitioned into sda1 and sda2. I have 3 other discs (sdc-sde) that
> i'd like to make partition-less systems and then add
I have a btrfs non-raid file system that i'd like to convert to
raid10. This single device has my efi boot partion on it, so it's
partitioned into sda1 and sda2. I have 3 other discs (sdc-sde) that
i'd like to make partition-less systems and then add them to the first
disc (sda) using the steps in
12 matches
Mail list logo
