1:27 (GMT+09:00)
Title : Re: Re: Porting BTRFS to user space
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 12:03:29PM +, 인정식 wrote:
> Thank you for the advise.
> I am still wonder why there are same-name files in btrfs(kernel source) and
> btrfs-progs.
> They are quite many as follows.
> ba
Hi all,
maybe interesting to know,
I'm working on a backup service, which uses btrfs for making snapshots.
The user can assign a folder for backup very easy, and create "rules" per backup
of what to backup. Right now it works with assigning mimetypes to a backup:
the files ot these mimetypes will
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 12:27:57 PM Hugo Mills wrote:
> (NFS, Ceph, Gluster certainly work this way. I would be surprised if
> any of the others out there at the moment didn't work like that).
GPFS has its own underlying filesystem format, you can upgrade the
format on the fly with mmchfs once all you
way. I would be surprised if any of the others out
there at the moment didn't work like that).
Hugo.
> --- Original Message ---
> Sender : Austin S Hemmelgarn
> Date : 2015-04-08 20:37 (GMT+09:00)
> Title : Re: Porting BTRFS to user space
>
> On 2015-04-07 19:5
to port btrfs from kernel to user space?
Or at least can I utilize the them so that I have to only port the remaining
files?
--- Original Message ---
Sender : Austin S Hemmelgarn
Date : 2015-04-08 20:37 (GMT+09:00)
Title : Re: Porting BTRFS to user space
On 2015-04-07 19:57, 인정식
On 2015-04-07 19:57, 인정식 wrote:
> Thank you for the information.
> I just found that btrfs-progs includes several files that seem modified from
> btrfs kernel source.
> I am not sure exactly what they are.
> Web pages say libbtrfs is to provide interface for apps that use btrfs.
> Why should there
: Porting BTRFS to user space
On 2015-04-06 21:28, 인정식 wrote:
> Hello BTRFS developers,
>
> I am requesting your opion.
>
> I am planning to design and implement DFS version of BTRFS.
> Roughly it will be done by
> 1. Extending current DeviceID to NodeID:DeviceID to suppo
On 2015-04-06 21:28, 인정식 wrote:
> Hello BTRFS developers,
>
> I am requesting your opion.
>
> I am planning to design and implement DFS version of BTRFS.
> Roughly it will be done by
> 1. Extending current DeviceID to NodeID:DeviceID to support multi-node,
> and
> 2. Implementing inter-n
Hello BTRFS developers,
I am requesting your opion.
I am planning to design and implement DFS version of BTRFS.
Roughly it will be done by
1. Extending current DeviceID to NodeID:DeviceID to support multi-node, and
2. Implementing inter-node data and meta-data access over TCP.
Do you thin
