Re: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE before -D

2013-02-12 Thread David Sterba
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 09:02:06PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:30:21 +0100 > Ian Kumlien wrote: > > > My builds are cluttered with: > > :0:0: warning: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined [enabled by > > default] > > > > Which makes it hard to tell if something breaks or not

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE before -D

2013-02-09 Thread Ian Kumlien
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:06:26AM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 19:57:20 +0100 > Ian Kumlien wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 09:02:06PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:30:21 +0100 > > > Ian Kumlien wrote: > > > > > > > My builds are cl

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE before -D

2013-02-09 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 19:57:20 +0100 Ian Kumlien wrote: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 09:02:06PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:30:21 +0100 > > Ian Kumlien wrote: > > > > > My builds are cluttered with: > > > :0:0: warning: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined [enabled by > > > def

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE before -D

2013-02-09 Thread Ian Kumlien
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 09:02:06PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:30:21 +0100 > Ian Kumlien wrote: > > > My builds are cluttered with: > > :0:0: warning: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined [enabled by > > default] > > > > Which makes it hard to tell if something breaks or not

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE before -D

2013-02-09 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:30:21 +0100 Ian Kumlien wrote: > My builds are cluttered with: > :0:0: warning: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined [enabled by > default] > > Which makes it hard to tell if something breaks or not. > I don't know about you, but bilding with > GCC 4.7.2 on gentoo, this is a issu