On 5/2/18 5:11 PM, je...@suse.com wrote:
> From: Jeff Mahoney
>
> Commit 8d9eddad194 (Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan worker initialization)
> fixed the issue with BTRFS_IOC_QUOTA_RESCAN_WAIT being racy, but
> ended up reintroducing the hang-on-unmount bug that the commit it
> intended
On 5/2/18 5:11 PM, je...@suse.com wrote:
> From: Jeff Mahoney
>
> Commit 8d9eddad194 (Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan worker initialization)
> fixed the issue with BTRFS_IOC_QUOTA_RESCAN_WAIT being racy, but
> ended up reintroducing the hang-on-unmount bug that the commit it
> intended
On 5/3/18 11:52 AM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 3.05.2018 16:39, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>> On 5/3/18 3:24 AM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3.05.2018 00:11, je...@suse.com wrote:
From: Jeff Mahoney
Commit 8d9eddad194 (Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan worker
On 3.05.2018 16:39, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> On 5/3/18 3:24 AM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3.05.2018 00:11, je...@suse.com wrote:
>>> From: Jeff Mahoney
>>>
>>> Commit 8d9eddad194 (Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan worker initialization)
>>> fixed the issue with
On 5/3/18 3:24 AM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 3.05.2018 00:11, je...@suse.com wrote:
>> From: Jeff Mahoney
>>
>> Commit 8d9eddad194 (Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan worker initialization)
>> fixed the issue with BTRFS_IOC_QUOTA_RESCAN_WAIT being racy, but
>> ended up
On 3.05.2018 00:11, je...@suse.com wrote:
> From: Jeff Mahoney
>
> Commit 8d9eddad194 (Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan worker initialization)
> fixed the issue with BTRFS_IOC_QUOTA_RESCAN_WAIT being racy, but
> ended up reintroducing the hang-on-unmount bug that the commit it
>
On 5/2/18 9:15 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 12:29:28PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 03:23:49PM -0400, je...@suse.com wrote:
>>> From: Jeff Mahoney
>>> +static void queue_rescan_worker(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>>> +{
>>> +
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 12:29:28PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 03:23:49PM -0400, je...@suse.com wrote:
> > From: Jeff Mahoney
> > +static void queue_rescan_worker(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> > +{
> > + mutex_lock(_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
> > +
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 03:23:49PM -0400, je...@suse.com wrote:
> From: Jeff Mahoney
> +static void queue_rescan_worker(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
> + if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info)) {
> +
On 4/30/18 2:20 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年04月27日 03:23, je...@suse.com wrote:
>> From: Jeff Mahoney
>>
>> Commit d2c609b834d6 (Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan worker initialization)
>> fixed the issue with BTRFS_IOC_QUOTA_RESCAN_WAIT being racy, but
>> ended up reintroducing
On 2018年04月27日 03:23, je...@suse.com wrote:
> From: Jeff Mahoney
>
> Commit d2c609b834d6 (Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan worker initialization)
> fixed the issue with BTRFS_IOC_QUOTA_RESCAN_WAIT being racy, but
> ended up reintroducing the hang-on-unmount bug that the commit it
>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 03:28:44PM -0400, Noah Massey wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:56 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 03:23:49PM -0400, je...@suse.com wrote:
> >> From: Jeff Mahoney
> >>
> >> Commit d2c609b834d6 (Btrfs: fix qgroup
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 03:32:14PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> On 4/27/18 12:40 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:02:13PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> +static void queue_rescan_worker(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> +{
> >>>
> >>> And this had to be moved upwards
On 4/27/18 12:40 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:02:13PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
+static void queue_rescan_worker(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
+{
>>>
>>> And this had to be moved upwards as there was earlier use of
>>> btrfs_queue_work that matched following the
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:56 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 03:23:49PM -0400, je...@suse.com wrote:
>> From: Jeff Mahoney
>>
>> Commit d2c609b834d6 (Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan worker initialization)
>> fixed the issue with
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:02:13PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> >> +static void queue_rescan_worker(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> >> +{
> >
> > And this had to be moved upwards as there was earlier use of
> > btrfs_queue_work that matched following the hunk.
>
> Weird. That must be exactly
On 4/27/18 11:56 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 03:23:49PM -0400, je...@suse.com wrote:
>> From: Jeff Mahoney
>>
>> Commit d2c609b834d6 (Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan worker initialization)
>> fixed the issue with BTRFS_IOC_QUOTA_RESCAN_WAIT being racy, but
>> ended
On 4/27/18 4:48 AM, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 8:23 PM, wrote:
>> From: Jeff Mahoney
>>
>> Commit d2c609b834d6 (Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan worker initialization)
>> fixed the issue with BTRFS_IOC_QUOTA_RESCAN_WAIT being racy, but
>> ended up
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 03:23:49PM -0400, je...@suse.com wrote:
> From: Jeff Mahoney
>
> Commit d2c609b834d6 (Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan worker initialization)
> fixed the issue with BTRFS_IOC_QUOTA_RESCAN_WAIT being racy, but
> ended up reintroducing the hang-on-unmount bug that
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 8:23 PM, wrote:
> From: Jeff Mahoney
>
> Commit d2c609b834d6 (Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan worker initialization)
> fixed the issue with BTRFS_IOC_QUOTA_RESCAN_WAIT being racy, but
> ended up reintroducing the hang-on-unmount bug that the
On 26.04.2018 22:23, je...@suse.com wrote:
> From: Jeff Mahoney
>
> Commit d2c609b834d6 (Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan worker initialization)
> fixed the issue with BTRFS_IOC_QUOTA_RESCAN_WAIT being racy, but
> ended up reintroducing the hang-on-unmount bug that the commit it
>
21 matches
Mail list logo