On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:29:40AM +0100, Merlijn Wajer wrote:
> That is fine; at this point there are not a lot of people using an
> alternative libc, so this is common practice. I'll be here with a new
> round of patches if it breaks in a future release; it shouldn't really
> break too often. :)
Hi,
On 17/12/14 17:49, David Sterba wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 03:35:09PM +0100, Merlijn Wajer wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> Attached are the two patches generated with git format-patch. I am aware
>> that this may not be required format for submitting patches -- but
>> please give me some time to g
On 2014-12-17 11:49, David Sterba wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 03:35:09PM +0100, Merlijn Wajer wrote:
[snip]
Please let me know if musl-libc (or any other libc) is a supported
platform, and if so, if and how I can improve on said patches.
I'm not aware of non-glibc users, but I don't see any
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 03:35:09PM +0100, Merlijn Wajer wrote:
[snip]
> Attached are the two patches generated with git format-patch. I am aware
> that this may not be required format for submitting patches -- but
> please give me some time to get used to the etiquette. :-)
Thanks, there are mino
