At 09/26/2016 10:16 AM, Sean Greenslade wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 04:51:21PM -0400, Sean Greenslade wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:02:38PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Glad to hear you've found the core of the issue.
At this point, I can trigger it immediately. As soon as I log in and run
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 04:51:21PM -0400, Sean Greenslade wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:02:38PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > > Glad to hear you've found the core of the issue.
> > >
> > > At this point, I can trigger it immediately. As soon as I log in and run
> > > dmenu, it will attempt to
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:02:38PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > Glad to hear you've found the core of the issue.
> >
> > At this point, I can trigger it immediately. As soon as I log in and run
> > dmenu, it will attempt to rebuild its cache file (small text file that's
> > just a list of all execu
At 09/20/2016 11:39 AM, Sean Greenslade wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:49:42AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
OK, I see the problem now.
The new convert is designed to create minimal number of extents, so it
result the following file extents layout:
Ext2_save/image
|
/---
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:49:42AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> OK, I see the problem now.
>
> The new convert is designed to create minimal number of extents, so it
> result the following file extents layout:
>
> Ext2_save/image
> |
> /---\
> | Extent A
At 09/19/2016 11:13 PM, Sean Greenslade wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:30:28PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
All chunks are completed convert to DUP, no small chunk, all to its maximum
chunk size.
So from chunk level, nothing related to convert yet.
But for extent tree, I found several extents a
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:30:28PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> All chunks are completed convert to DUP, no small chunk, all to its maximum
> chunk size.
> So from chunk level, nothing related to convert yet.
>
> But for extent tree, I found several extents are heavily referred to.
> Like extent 1581
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:20:37AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
> -95 is -EOPNOTSUPP.
>
> Not a common errno in btrfs.
>
> Most EOPNOTSUPP are related to discard and crapped fallcate/drop extents.
>
> Then are you using discard mount option?
I did indeed have the discard mount option enabled. I t
At 09/17/2016 04:23 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Sean Greenslade
wrote:
Hi, all. I've been playing around with an old laptop of mine, and I
figured I'd use it as a learning / bugfinding opportunity. Its /home
partition was originally ext3. I have a full partition i
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 07:27:58PM -0700, Liu Bo wrote:
> Interesting, seems that we get errors from
>
> btrfs_finish_ordered_io
> insert_reserved_file_extent
> __btrfs_drop_extents
>
> And splitting an inline extent throws -95.
Heh, you beat me to the draw. I was just coming to the same
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 03:25:00PM -0400, Sean Greenslade wrote:
> Hi, all. I've been playing around with an old laptop of mine, and I
> figured I'd use it as a learning / bugfinding opportunity. Its /home
> partition was originally ext3. I have a full partition image of this
> drive as a backup, s
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 05:45:59PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Sean Greenslade
> wrote:
>
> > In the mean time, is there any way to make the kernel more verbose about
> > btrfs errors? It would be nice to see, for example, what was in the
> > transaction that fai
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Sean Greenslade
wrote:
> In the mean time, is there any way to make the kernel more verbose about
> btrfs errors? It would be nice to see, for example, what was in the
> transaction that failed, or at least what files / metadata it was
> touching.
No idea. Maybe
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:23:44PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Not a mess, I think it's a good bug report. I think Qu and David know
> more about the latest iteration of the convert code. If you can wait
> until next week at least to see if they have questions that'd be best.
> If you need to get
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Sean Greenslade
wrote:
> Hi, all. I've been playing around with an old laptop of mine, and I
> figured I'd use it as a learning / bugfinding opportunity. Its /home
> partition was originally ext3. I have a full partition image of this
> drive as a backup, so I can
15 matches
Mail list logo
