> On Dec 5, 2017, at 7:54 AM, David Sterba wrote:
>
> I had a different branch with patches from openSUSE, so the diffs apply with
> minimal efforts to the package. The branch btrfs-zstd has been synced up. The
> ENOMEM error was not from the file decompression but from the zstdio.c module,
> th
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:44:32AM +, Nick Terrell wrote:
> >> It looks like XZ had the same issue, and they make the decompression
> >> context a static object (grep for GRUB_EMBED_DECOMPRESSOR). We could
> >> potentially do the same and statically allocate the workspace:
> >>
> >> ```
> >> /
29.11.2017 16:24, Austin S. Hemmelgarn пишет:
> On 2017-11-28 18:49, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:31:57PM +, Nick Terrell wrote:
>>>
On Nov 21, 2017, at 8:22 AM, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:09:15PM +, Nick Terrell wrote:
> On 11/15
On 2017-11-28 18:49, David Sterba wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:31:57PM +, Nick Terrell wrote:
On Nov 21, 2017, at 8:22 AM, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:09:15PM +, Nick Terrell wrote:
On 11/15/17, 6:41 AM, "David Sterba" wrote:
The branch is now in a state th
> On Nov 28, 2017, at 3:49 PM, David Sterba wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:31:57PM +, Nick Terrell wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 21, 2017, at 8:22 AM, David Sterba wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:09:15PM +, Nick Terrell wrote:
On 11/15/17, 6:41 AM, "David Sterba" wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:31:57PM +, Nick Terrell wrote:
>
> > On Nov 21, 2017, at 8:22 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:09:15PM +, Nick Terrell wrote:
> >> On 11/15/17, 6:41 AM, "David Sterba" wrote:
> >>> The branch is now in a state that can be tested. Turn
> On Nov 21, 2017, at 8:22 AM, David Sterba wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:09:15PM +, Nick Terrell wrote:
>> On 11/15/17, 6:41 AM, "David Sterba" wrote:
>>> The branch is now in a state that can be tested. Turns out the memory
>>> requirements are too much for grub, so the boot fails
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:09:15PM +, Nick Terrell wrote:
> On 11/15/17, 6:41 AM, "David Sterba" wrote:
> > The branch is now in a state that can be tested. Turns out the memory
> > requirements are too much for grub, so the boot fails with "not enough
> > memory". The calculated value
> >
> >
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:23:44 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Tho from my understanding and last I read, btrfs restore (I believe
> it was) hadn't been updated to handle zstd yet, tho btrfs check and
> btrfs filesystem defrag had been, and of course btrfs balance if the
> kernel h
Austin S. Hemmelgarn posted on Tue, 14 Nov 2017 07:38:03 -0500 as
excerpted:
> On 2017-11-14 02:34, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>> Hello David.
>>
>> David Sterba - 13.11.17, 23:50:
>>> while 4.14 is still fresh, let me address some concerns I've seen on
>>> linux forums already.
>>>
>>> The newly
On 11/15/17, 6:41 AM, "David Sterba" wrote:
> The branch is now in a state that can be tested. Turns out the memory
> requirements are too much for grub, so the boot fails with "not enough
> memory". The calculated value
>
> ZSTD_BTRFS_MAX_INPUT: 131072
> ZSTD_DStreamWorkspaceBound with ZSTD_BTRFS
Imran Geriskovan posted on Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:16:56 +0200 as excerpted:
> On 11/15/17, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>> Somehow I am happy that I still have a plain Ext4 for /boot. :)
>
> You may use uncompressed btrfs for /boot.
> Both Syslinux (my choice) and Grub supports it.
And I've been runn
On 11/15/17, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Somehow I am happy that I still have a plain Ext4 for /boot. :)
You may use uncompressed btrfs for /boot.
Both Syslinux (my choice) and Grub supports it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to
David Sterba - 15.11.17, 15:39:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 07:53:31PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:50:46PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > > Up to now, there are no bootloaders supporting ZSTD.
> >
> > I've tried to implement the support to GRUB, still incomplete and hac
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 07:53:31PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:50:46PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > Up to now, there are no bootloaders supporting ZSTD.
>
> I've tried to implement the support to GRUB, still incomplete and hacky
> but most of the code is there. The Z
David Sterba - 14.11.17, 19:49:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:34:37AM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Hello David.
> >
> > David Sterba - 13.11.17, 23:50:
> > > while 4.14 is still fresh, let me address some concerns I've seen on
> > > linux
> > > forums already.
> > >
> > > The newly added Z
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:50:46PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> Up to now, there are no bootloaders supporting ZSTD.
I've tried to implement the support to GRUB, still incomplete and hacky
but most of the code is there. The ZSTD implementation is copied from
kernel. The allocators need to be prop
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:34:37AM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Hello David.
>
> David Sterba - 13.11.17, 23:50:
> > while 4.14 is still fresh, let me address some concerns I've seen on linux
> > forums already.
> >
> > The newly added ZSTD support is a feature that has broader impact than
On 2017-11-14 02:34, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Hello David.
David Sterba - 13.11.17, 23:50:
while 4.14 is still fresh, let me address some concerns I've seen on linux
forums already.
The newly added ZSTD support is a feature that has broader impact than
just the runtime compression. The btrfs-
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-btrfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-btrfs-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Martin Steigerwald
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 November 2017 6:35 PM
> To: dste...@suse.cz; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Read before you d
Hello David.
David Sterba - 13.11.17, 23:50:
> while 4.14 is still fresh, let me address some concerns I've seen on linux
> forums already.
>
> The newly added ZSTD support is a feature that has broader impact than
> just the runtime compression. The btrfs-progs understand filesystem with
> ZSTD
Hi,
while 4.14 is still fresh, let me address some concerns I've seen on linux
forums already.
The newly added ZSTD support is a feature that has broader impact than
just the runtime compression. The btrfs-progs understand filesystem with
ZSTD since 4.13. The remaining key part is the bootloader.
22 matches
Mail list logo