ST wrote:
Hello,
I've recently learned about btrfs and consider to utilize for my needs.
I have several questions in this regard:
I manage a dedicated server remotely and have some sort of script that
installs an OS from several images. There I can define partitions and
their FSs.
1. By
02.11.2017 20:13, Austin S. Hemmelgarn пишет:
>>
>> 2. I want to limit access to sftp, so there will be no custom commands
>> to execute...
> A custom version of the 'quota' command would be easy to add in there.
> In fact, this is really the only option right now, since setting up sudo
> (or
On 2017-11-02 12:28, ST wrote:
On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 19:16 +0300, Marat Khalili wrote:
Could somebody among developers please elaborate on this issue - is
checking quota going always to be done by root? If so - btrfs might be
a no-go for our use case...
Not a developer, but sysadmin here:
On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 19:16 +0300, Marat Khalili wrote:
> > Could somebody among developers please elaborate on this issue - is
> checking quota going always to be done by root? If so - btrfs might be
> a no-go for our use case...
>
> Not a developer, but sysadmin here: what prevents you from
> >> There's one other caveat though, only root can use the qgroup ioctls,
> >> which means that only root can check quotas.
> >
> > Only root can check quotas?! That is really strange. How users are
> > supposed to know they are about to be out of space?... Is this by design
> > so and will
On 2017-11-02 05:09, ST wrote:
Ok. I'll use more standard approaches. Which of following commands will
work with BTRFS:
https://debian-handbook.info/browse/stable/sect.quotas.html
None, qgroups are the only option right now with BTRFS, and it's pretty
likely to stay that way since the
> >>>
> >>> Ok. I'll use more standard approaches. Which of following commands will
> >>> work with BTRFS:
> >>>
> >>> https://debian-handbook.info/browse/stable/sect.quotas.html
> >> None, qgroups are the only option right now with BTRFS, and it's pretty
> >> likely to stay that way since the
On 2017-11-01 13:52, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
01.11.2017 15:01, Austin S. Hemmelgarn пишет:
...
The default subvolume is what gets mounted if you don't specify a
subvolume to mount. On a newly created filesystem, it's subvolume ID 5,
which is the top-level of the filesystem itself. Debian does
01.11.2017 15:01, Austin S. Hemmelgarn пишет:
...
> The default subvolume is what gets mounted if you don't specify a
> subvolume to mount. On a newly created filesystem, it's subvolume ID 5,
> which is the top-level of the filesystem itself. Debian does not
> specify a subvo9lume in /etc/fstab
On 2017-11-01 10:05, ST wrote:
3. in my current ext4-based setup I have two servers while one syncs
files of certain dir to the other using lsyncd (which launches rsync on
inotify events). As far as I have understood it is more efficient to use
btrfs send/receive (over ssh) than rsync (over
On 11/01/2017 03:05 PM, ST wrote as excerpted:
>> However, it's important to know that if your users have shell access,
>> they can bypass qgroups. Normal users can create subvolumes, and new
>> subvolumes aren't added to an existing qgroup by default (and unless I'm
>> mistaken, aren't
> >>> 3. in my current ext4-based setup I have two servers while one syncs
> >>> files of certain dir to the other using lsyncd (which launches rsync on
> >>> inotify events). As far as I have understood it is more efficient to use
> >>> btrfs send/receive (over ssh) than rsync (over ssh) to sync
ST posted on Tue, 31 Oct 2017 22:06:24 +0200 as excerpted:
> Also another questions in this regard - I tried to "set-default" and
> then reboot and it worked nice - I landed indeed in the snapshot, not
> top-level volume. However /etc/fstab didn't change and actually showed
> that top-level
On 2017-10-31 16:06, ST wrote:
Thank you very much for such an informative response!
On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 13:45 -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2017-10-31 12:23, ST wrote:
Hello,
I've recently learned about btrfs and consider to utilize for my needs.
I have several questions in this
Thank you very much for such an informative response!
On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 13:45 -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2017-10-31 12:23, ST wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've recently learned about btrfs and consider to utilize for my needs.
> > I have several questions in this regard:
> >
> >
On 2017-10-31 14:51, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
31.10.2017 20:45, Austin S. Hemmelgarn пишет:
On 2017-10-31 12:23, ST wrote:
Hello,
I've recently learned about btrfs and consider to utilize for my needs.
I have several questions in this regard:
I manage a dedicated server remotely and have some
31.10.2017 20:45, Austin S. Hemmelgarn пишет:
> On 2017-10-31 12:23, ST wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've recently learned about btrfs and consider to utilize for my needs.
>> I have several questions in this regard:
>>
>> I manage a dedicated server remotely and have some sort of script that
>>
On 2017-10-31 12:23, ST wrote:
Hello,
I've recently learned about btrfs and consider to utilize for my needs.
I have several questions in this regard:
I manage a dedicated server remotely and have some sort of script that
installs an OS from several images. There I can define partitions and
Hello,
I've recently learned about btrfs and consider to utilize for my needs.
I have several questions in this regard:
I manage a dedicated server remotely and have some sort of script that
installs an OS from several images. There I can define partitions and
their FSs.
1. By default the
Hello,
I've recently learned about btrfs and consider to utilize for my needs.
I have several questions in this regard:
I manage a dedicated server remotely and have some sort of script that
installs an OS from several images. There I can define partitions and
their FSs.
1. By default the
20 matches
Mail list logo
