Hugo Mills posted on Fri, 13 Nov 2015 21:13:41 + as excerpted:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 09:11:46PM +, Duncan wrote:
>> Hugo Mills posted on Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:55:20 + as excerpted:
>>
>> > receive is implemented almost exclusively in userspace, with only a
>> > couple of ioctls for
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 09:11:46PM +, Duncan wrote:
> Hugo Mills posted on Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:55:20 + as excerpted:
>
> > receive is implemented almost exclusively in userspace, with only a
> > couple of ioctls for mucking around with the UUIDs at the end.
>
> I wasn't aware of that and
Hugo Mills posted on Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:55:20 + as excerpted:
> receive is implemented almost exclusively in userspace, with only a
> couple of ioctls for mucking around with the UUIDs at the end.
I wasn't aware of that and had assumed kernel space. Apart from the
topic of discussion here,
On 2015-11-13 14:55, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:40:44PM -0500, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2015-11-13 13:42, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 01:10:12PM -0500, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2015-11-13 12:30, Vedran Vucic wrote:
Hello,
Here are outputs of commands
Hello,
My system is on laptop that is not heavy duty such as servers.
openSuse 13.2 was installed approx 2 months ago so the issue did not
appear due to longterm lack of administration or maintenance.
Please let me know if I can help in any other way.
Thanks,
vedran
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:15
Hello,
I guess that it might be bug in kernel.
I was successful this:
btrfs balance start / -dusage=50 -musage=35
musage above 35 caused ENOSPC message. Otherwise it was good.
Thanks on support,
vedran
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 01:10:12PM -050
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:40:44PM -0500, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2015-11-13 13:42, Hugo Mills wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 01:10:12PM -0500, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> >>On 2015-11-13 12:30, Vedran Vucic wrote:
> >>>Hello,
> >>>
> >>>Here are outputs of commands as you requested:
>
On 2015-11-13 13:42, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 01:10:12PM -0500, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2015-11-13 12:30, Vedran Vucic wrote:
Hello,
Here are outputs of commands as you requested:
btrfs fi df /
Data, single: total=8.00GiB, used=7.71GiB
System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 01:10:12PM -0500, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2015-11-13 12:30, Vedran Vucic wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >Here are outputs of commands as you requested:
> > btrfs fi df /
> >Data, single: total=8.00GiB, used=7.71GiB
> >System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
> >Metadata,
On 2015-11-13 12:30, Vedran Vucic wrote:
Hello,
Here are outputs of commands as you requested:
btrfs fi df /
Data, single: total=8.00GiB, used=7.71GiB
System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
Metadata, DUP: total=1.12GiB, used=377.25MiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=128.00MiB, used=0.00B
btr
Helo,
Yes, Illegal one is deleted. Sorry it was my typo.
Thanks,
vedran
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Henk Slager wrote:
> Vedran,
>
> I see 2 snapshot numbers (748 and 741), maybe copy-paste error or
> typo, but can you confirm that the illegal one is deleted?
>
> /Henk
>
> On Fri, Nov 13,
Vedran,
I see 2 snapshot numbers (748 and 741), maybe copy-paste error or
typo, but can you confirm that the illegal one is deleted?
/Henk
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Vedran Vucic wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here are outputs of commands as you requested:
> btrfs fi df /
> Data, single: total=8.00
Hello,
Here are outputs of commands as you requested:
btrfs fi df /
Data, single: total=8.00GiB, used=7.71GiB
System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
Metadata, DUP: total=1.12GiB, used=377.25MiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=128.00MiB, used=0.00B
btrfs fi show
Label: none uuid: d6934db3-3ac9-
On 2015-11-13 11:12, Vedran Vucic wrote:
Hello,
I succeeded to delete illegal snapshot with command:
btrfs subvolume delete /.snapshots/741/snapshot
When I have done
btrfs balance / -dusage=0 -musage=0
increasing value up to 4o I did not have issues.
But on value 4- for-dusage= and -musage=
I go
Hello,
I succeeded to delete illegal snapshot with command:
btrfs subvolume delete /.snapshots/741/snapshot
When I have done
btrfs balance / -dusage=0 -musage=0
increasing value up to 4o I did not have issues.
But on value 4- for-dusage= and -musage=
I got message that there is no space left on di
On 2015-11-11 17:11, Vedran Vucic wrote:
Hello,
I use OpenSuse 13.2 on my Toshiba Satellite laptop. I noticed that I run
out of disk space, checked documentation and I realized that there were
many snapshots. I used Yast Snapper to delete snapshots.
I noticed that one snapshot with number 748
Hello,
I use OpenSuse 13.2 on my Toshiba Satellite laptop. I noticed that I run
out of disk space, checked documentation and I realized that there were
many snapshots. I used Yast Snapper to delete snapshots.
I noticed that one snapshot with number 748 could not be deleted.
I entered terminal an
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Andreas Philipp
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to the known (and fixed) bug in kernel 3.17.0 one of my btrfs
> volume suffers from unreadable and - even worse - uneraseable
> snapshots. Whenever such a snapshot is accessed there is "parent
> transid verify failed" in dmesg.
+linux-btrfs,-linux-ext4
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 01:28:04PM +0100, Andreas Philipp wrote:
>
> Due to the known (and fixed) bug in kernel 3.17.0 one of my btrfs
> volume suffers from unreadable and - even worse - uneraseable
> snapshots. Whenever such a snapshot is accessed there is "parent
> tran
19 matches
Mail list logo
