On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Patrick Tschackert wrote:
> My raid is done with the scrub now, this is what i get:
>
> $ cat /sys/block/md0/md/mismatch_cnt
> 311936608
I think this is an assembly problem. Read errors don't result in
mismatch counts. An md mismatch count
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> On Sonntag, 20. März 2016 10:18:26 CET Patrick Tschackert wrote:
>> > I think in retrospect the safe way to do these kinds of Virtual Box
>> > updates, which require kernel module updates, would have been to
>> >
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Patrick Tschackert wrote:
> Thanks for answering again!
> So, first of all I installed a newer kernel from the backports as per
> Nicholas D Steeves suggestion:
>
> $ apt-get install -t jessie-backports linux-image-4.3.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
>
>
On Sonntag, 20. März 2016 10:18:26 CET Patrick Tschackert wrote:
> > I think in retrospect the safe way to do these kinds of Virtual Box
> > updates, which require kernel module updates, would have been to
> > shutdown the VM and stop the array. *shrug*
>
>
> After this, I think I'll just do
ackert" <killing-t...@gmx.de>, "Btrfs BTRFS"
<linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Betreff: Re: unable to mount btrfs partition, please help :(
On Samstag, 19. März 2016 19:34:55 CET Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>> $ uname -a
> >>> Linux vmhost 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 S
On Samstag, 19. März 2016 19:34:55 CET Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>> $ uname -a
> >>> Linux vmhost 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u4
> >>> (2016-02-29) x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >>
> >>This is old. You should upgrade to something newer, ideally 4.5 but
> >>4.4.6 is good also, and then oldest
Thanks for answering again!
So, first of all I installed a newer kernel from the backports as per Nicholas
D Steeves suggestion:
$ apt-get install -t jessie-backports linux-image-4.3.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
After rebooting:
$ uname -a
Linux vmhost 4.3.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.3.5-1~bpo8+1
Patrick Tschackert posted on Sat, 19 Mar 2016 23:15:33 +0100 as excerpted:
> I'm growing increasingly desperate, can anyone help me?
No need to be desperate. As the sysadmin's rule of backups states,
simple form, you either have at least one level of backup, or you are by
your (in)action
On 19 March 2016 at 21:34, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Patrick Tschackert
> wrote:
$ uname -a
Linux vmhost 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u4
(2016-02-29) x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>This is old. You
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Patrick Tschackert wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> thank you for answering so quickly!
>
>> Try 'btrfs check' without any options first.
> $ btrfs check /dev/mapper/storage
> checksum verify failed on 36340960788480 found 8F8E1006 wanted 4AA1BC89
>
Hi Chris,
thank you for answering so quickly!
> Try 'btrfs check' without any options first.
$ btrfs check /dev/mapper/storage
checksum verify failed on 36340960788480 found 8F8E1006 wanted 4AA1BC89
checksum verify failed on 36340960788480 found 8F8E1006 wanted 4AA1BC89
bytenr mismatch,
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Patrick Tschackert wrote:
> I'm growing increasingly desperate, can anyone help me? I'm thinking
> of trying one or more of the following, but would like an informed
> opinion:
> 1) btrfs check --fix-crc
> 2) btrfs-check --init-csum-tree
> 3)
Hi,
Apologies if this eMail reaches the mailing list multiple times, i can't seem
to get throught to the mailing list, so I'm sending it through a different
account now...
I'm having problems mounting my BTRFS filesystem. Here's what happened:
My BTRFS filesystem sits in an encrypted
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 01:45:32AM +0200, em...@joachim-neu.de wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:09:47 +0100, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 08:36:28PM +, em...@joachim-neu.de wrote:
Now I'm not able to mount my btrfs / and /home (both on the same
partition)
On 10/29/2011 08:45 AM, em...@joachim-neu.de wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:09:47 +0100, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 08:36:28PM +, em...@joachim-neu.de wrote:
Today I downgraded from Ubuntu's APT repo oneiric-proposed (which
brings some kernel 3.0.0-13)
Hello!
Today I downgraded from Ubuntu's APT repo oneiric-proposed (which
brings some kernel 3.0.0-13) back to the standard repo oneiric.
Now I'm not able to mount my btrfs / and /home (both on the same
partition) anymore:
device fsid SOME-UUID devid 1 transid 84229 /dev/dm-0
parent
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 08:36:28PM +, em...@joachim-neu.de wrote:
Today I downgraded from Ubuntu's APT repo oneiric-proposed (which
brings some kernel 3.0.0-13) back to the standard repo oneiric.
It's odd that switching from one 3.0.0 to another would cause
something bad to happen. Did
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:09:47 +0100, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 08:36:28PM +, em...@joachim-neu.de wrote:
Today I downgraded from Ubuntu's APT repo oneiric-proposed (which
brings some kernel 3.0.0-13) back to the standard repo oneiric.
It's odd that
18 matches
Mail list logo