On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:21:30PM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Is there any chance you got the line above [ cut here ]? (I hate that
>> > stupid [
>> > cut here ], it makes us
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:21:30PM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> >
> > Is there any chance you got the line above [ cut here ]? (I hate that
> > stupid [
> > cut here ], it makes us miss all the usefull info.) Thanks,
> >
> > Josef
>
> The
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> Is there any chance you got the line above [ cut here ]? (I hate that stupid
> [
> cut here ], it makes us miss all the usefull info.) Thanks,
>
> Josef
There was really nothing significant above the 'cut here'. Here it is
with over an
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 09:54:08PM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:31:07AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Mace Moneta wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:31:07AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Mace Moneta wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:52:19AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
>>
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:31:07AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Mace Moneta wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:52:19AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Mace Moneta wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:52:19AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:22:04AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
>>
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:52:19AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:22:04AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:52:19AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:22:04AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 07:46:16AM -0700, Mace Mone
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:22:04AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 07:46:16AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
>> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906142
>>
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:22:04AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 07:46:16AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906142
> >>
> >> With 3.8 kernels in Fedora 18, using encfs on btrfs
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 07:46:16AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906142
>>
>> With 3.8 kernels in Fedora 18, using encfs on btrfs I get the
>> following error. It can take hours of use before I get a
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 07:46:16AM -0700, Mace Moneta wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906142
>
> With 3.8 kernels in Fedora 18, using encfs on btrfs I get the
> following error. It can take hours of use before I get a
> reoccurrence, and I need to btrfsck, btrfs-zero-log, and
r a reboot. No data
appears to be lost, and a scrub runs to completion with no errors.
[14691.074991] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4718
map_private_extent_buffer+0xd4/0xe0 [btrfs]()
[14691.074993] Hardware name: C2SEA
[14691.074995] btrfs bad mapping eb start 645984256 len 4096, wan
14 matches
Mail list logo