在 2015年09月23日 17:40, Stéphane Lesimple 写道:
Le 2015-09-23 09:03, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/22 16:31 +0200:
Le 2015-09-22 10:51, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
[92098.842261] Call Trace:
[92098.842277] [] ?
read_extent_buffer+0xb8/0x110
[btrfs]
[92098.842304] [] ?
btrfs_fin
Le 2015-09-23 09:03, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/22 16:31 +0200:
Le 2015-09-22 10:51, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
[92098.842261] Call Trace:
[92098.842277] [] ?
read_extent_buffer+0xb8/0x110
[btrfs]
[92098.842304] [] ?
btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x70
[btrfs]
[92098.84232
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/22 16:31 +0200:
Le 2015-09-22 10:51, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
[92098.842261] Call Trace:
[92098.842277] [] ? read_extent_buffer+0xb8/0x110
[btrfs]
[92098.842304] [] ? btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x70
[btrfs]
[92098.842329] []
btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x28d/0x5a
Le 2015-09-22 10:51, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
[92098.842261] Call Trace:
[92098.842277] [] ?
read_extent_buffer+0xb8/0x110
[btrfs]
[92098.842304] [] ?
btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x70
[btrfs]
[92098.842329] []
btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x28d/0x5a0 [btrfs]
Would you please show the code of it?
在 2015年09月22日 16:40, Qu Wenruo 写道:
在 2015年09月22日 15:34, Stéphane Lesimple 写道:
Le 2015-09-22 03:37, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/22 03:30 +0200:
Le 2015-09-20 13:14, Stéphane Lesimple a écrit :
Le 2015-09-20 12:51, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Would you please use gdb to
在 2015年09月22日 15:34, Stéphane Lesimple 写道:
Le 2015-09-22 03:37, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/22 03:30 +0200:
Le 2015-09-20 13:14, Stéphane Lesimple a écrit :
Le 2015-09-20 12:51, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Would you please use gdb to show the codes of
"btrfs_qgroup_rescan
Le 2015-09-22 03:37, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/22 03:30 +0200:
Le 2015-09-20 13:14, Stéphane Lesimple a écrit :
Le 2015-09-20 12:51, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Would you please use gdb to show the codes of
"btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x388" ?
(Need kernel debuginfo)
My g
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/22 03:30 +0200:
Le 2015-09-20 13:14, Stéphane Lesimple a écrit :
Le 2015-09-20 12:51, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Would you please use gdb to show the codes of
"btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x388" ?
(Need kernel debuginfo)
My guess is the following line:(pretty sure,
Le 2015-09-20 13:14, Stéphane Lesimple a écrit :
Le 2015-09-20 12:51, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Would you please use gdb to show the codes of
"btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x388" ?
(Need kernel debuginfo)
My guess is the following line:(pretty sure, but not 100% sure)
--
/*
* only update s
Le 2015-09-20 12:51, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Would you please use gdb to show the codes of
"btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x388" ?
(Need kernel debuginfo)
My guess is the following line:(pretty sure, but not 100% sure)
--
/*
* only update status, since the previous part has alreay
updated
在 2015年09月20日 18:35, Stéphane Lesimple 写道:
Le 2015-09-20 03:22, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
The mentioned steps are as follows :
0) Rsync data from the next ext4 "snapshot" to the subvolume
1) Do 'sync; btrfs qgroup show -prce --raw' and save the output <==
2) Create the needed readonly snapshot o
Le 2015-09-20 03:22, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
The mentioned steps are as follows :
0) Rsync data from the next ext4 "snapshot" to the subvolume
1) Do 'sync; btrfs qgroup show -prce --raw' and save the output
<==
2) Create the needed readonly snapshot on btrfs
3) Do 'sync; btrfs qgroup show -prc
在 2015年09月18日 18:26, Stéphane Lesimple 写道:
Le 2015-09-18 12:15, Stéphane Lesimple a écrit :
Le 2015-09-18 09:36, Stéphane Lesimple a écrit :
Sure, I did a quota disable / quota enable before running the snapshot
debug procedure, so the qgroups were clean again when I started :
qgroupid
Le 2015-09-18 12:15, Stéphane Lesimple a écrit :
Le 2015-09-18 09:36, Stéphane Lesimple a écrit :
Sure, I did a quota disable / quota enable before running the snapshot
debug procedure, so the qgroups were clean again when I started :
qgroupid rfer excl max_rfer max_ex
Le 2015-09-18 09:36, Stéphane Lesimple a écrit :
Sure, I did a quota disable / quota enable before running the snapshot
debug procedure, so the qgroups were clean again when I started :
qgroupid rfer excl max_rfer max_excl parent
child
Le 2015-09-18 02:59, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/17 20:47 +0200:
Le 2015-09-17 12:41, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
In the meantime, I've reactivated quotas, umounted the filesystem
and
ran a btrfsck on it : as you would expect, there's no qgroup problem
reported so far.
At
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/17 20:47 +0200:
Le 2015-09-17 12:41, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
In the meantime, I've reactivated quotas, umounted the filesystem and
ran a btrfsck on it : as you would expect, there's no qgroup problem
reported so far.
At least, rescan code is working without pro
Le 2015-09-17 12:41, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
In the meantime, I've reactivated quotas, umounted the filesystem and
ran a btrfsck on it : as you would expect, there's no qgroup problem
reported so far.
At least, rescan code is working without problem.
I'll clear all my snapshots, run an quota resc
在 2015年09月17日 18:08, Stéphane Lesimple 写道:
Le 2015-09-17 10:11, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/17 10:02 +0200:
Le 2015-09-17 08:42, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/17 08:11 +0200:
Le 2015-09-17 05:03, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrot
Le 2015-09-17 10:11, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/17 10:02 +0200:
Le 2015-09-17 08:42, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/17 08:11 +0200:
Le 2015-09-17 05:03, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/16 22:41 +0200:
Le 2015-09-16 22
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/17 10:02 +0200:
Le 2015-09-17 08:42, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/17 08:11 +0200:
Le 2015-09-17 05:03, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/16 22:41 +0200:
Le 2015-09-16 22:18, Duncan a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/17 08:11 +0200:
Le 2015-09-17 05:03, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/16 22:41 +0200:
Le 2015-09-16 22:18, Duncan a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple posted on Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:04:20 +0200 as
excerpted:
Well actually it's the (d) option
Le 2015-09-17 08:42, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/17 08:11 +0200:
Le 2015-09-17 05:03, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/16 22:41 +0200:
Le 2015-09-16 22:18, Duncan a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple posted on Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:04:20 +0200 as
excerpte
Le 2015-09-17 08:29, Stéphane Lesimple a écrit :
Le 2015-09-16 15:04, Stéphane Lesimple a écrit :
I also disabled quota because it has almost for sure nothing
to do with the bug
As it turns out, it seems that this assertion was completely wrong.
I've got balance running for more than 16 hours
Le 2015-09-16 15:04, Stéphane Lesimple a écrit :
I also disabled quota because it has almost for sure nothing
to do with the bug
As it turns out, it seems that this assertion was completely wrong.
I've got balance running for more than 16 hours now, without a crash.
This is almost 50% of the
Le 2015-09-17 05:03, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/16 22:41 +0200:
Le 2015-09-16 22:18, Duncan a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple posted on Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:04:20 +0200 as
excerpted:
Well actually it's the (d) option ;)
I activate the quota feature for only one reason :
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/16 22:41 +0200:
Le 2015-09-16 22:18, Duncan a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple posted on Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:04:20 +0200 as excerpted:
Le 2015-09-16 12:46, Holger Hoffstätte a écrit :
I also disabled quota because it has almost for sure nothing to
do with the b
Le 2015-09-16 22:18, Duncan a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple posted on Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:04:20 +0200 as
excerpted:
Le 2015-09-16 12:46, Holger Hoffstätte a écrit :
I also disabled quota because it has almost for sure nothing to
do with the bug, and now btrsfck is 100% happy:
Yes. Quotas hav
Stéphane Lesimple posted on Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:04:20 +0200 as excerpted:
> Le 2015-09-16 12:46, Holger Hoffstätte a écrit :
>>
>> In that case the "crossing stripe boundary" messages are false
>> positives in btrfs-progs-4.2:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg47059.html
>>
>> This
Le 2015-09-16 12:46, Holger Hoffstätte a écrit :
On 09/16/15 12:28, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
Nice to know that this bug was already somewhat known, but I can
confirm that it actually doesn't come from an ext4 conversion on my
case.
In that case the "crossing stripe boundary" messages are false
On 09/16/15 12:28, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
> Nice to know that this bug was already somewhat known, but I can
> confirm that it actually doesn't come from an ext4 conversion on my
> case.
In that case the "crossing stripe boundary" messages are false positives
in btrfs-progs-4.2: http://www.spini
Le 2015-09-16 07:02, Duncan a écrit :
Stéphane Lesimple posted on Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:47:01 +0200 as
excerpted:
Le 2015-09-15 16:56, Josef Bacik a écrit :
On 09/15/2015 10:47 AM, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
I've been experiencing repetitive "kernel BUG" occurences in the
past
few days trying t
Stéphane Lesimple posted on Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:47:01 +0200 as excerpted:
> Le 2015-09-15 16:56, Josef Bacik a écrit :
>> On 09/15/2015 10:47 AM, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
I've been experiencing repetitive "kernel BUG" occurences in the past
few days trying to balance a raid5 filesystem a
Le 2015-09-15 16:56, Josef Bacik a écrit :
On 09/15/2015 10:47 AM, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
I've been experiencing repetitive "kernel BUG" occurences in the past
few days trying to balance a raid5 filesystem after adding a new
drive.
It occurs on both 4.2.0 and 4.1.7, using 4.2 userspace tools
On 09/15/2015 10:47 AM, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
I've been experiencing repetitive "kernel BUG" occurences in the past
few days trying to balance a raid5 filesystem after adding a new drive.
It occurs on both 4.2.0 and 4.1.7, using 4.2 userspace tools.
I've ran a scrub on this filesystem after
I've been experiencing repetitive "kernel BUG" occurences in the past
few days trying to balance a raid5 filesystem after adding a new drive.
It occurs on both 4.2.0 and 4.1.7, using 4.2 userspace tools.
I've ran a scrub on this filesystem after the crash happened twice, and
if found no errors.
Hello btrfs-aholics,
I've been experiencing repetitive "kernel BUG" occurences in the past
few days trying to balance a raid5 filesystem after adding a new drive.
It occurs on both 4.2.0 and 4.1.7, using 4.2 userspace tools.
The raid5 setup was 2x4T drives (created 3 days ago to upgrade smooth
37 matches
Mail list logo
