with discussion about outdated benchmarks, of which this
will soon be.
--- On Tue, 7/7/09, Josh Berry d...@condordes.net wrote:
From: Josh Berry d...@condordes.net
Subject: Re: new benchmark btrfs 0.19 vs. ext4
To: Morten P.D. Stevens mstev...@win-professional.com
Cc: Brian Neu proclivit...@yahoo.com
To: Morten P.D. Stevens
Subject: Re: new benchmark btrfs 0.19 vs. ext4
These graphs represent your data.
I thought it would be easier to see the progress visually.
I tried posting to the list, but my post may have exceeded the size limit.
Maybe you could put on the web and post a link
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 17:06, Morten P.D.
Stevensmstev...@win-professional.com wrote:
Hi Brian,
thanks for the chart.
Here are the results visually for all:
http://www2.win-professional.com/images2/btrfs01.png
http://www2.win-professional.com/images2/btrfs02.png
What are the units? Are
Hi Chris and all btrfs users,
here is a new benchmark with the newest btrfs version 0.19 vs. ext4.
Linux lenny 2.6.31-rc2 #1 SMP Mon Jul 6 11:36:22 CEST 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
lenny:/# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdb
operation complete
Btrfs Btrfs v0.19
btrfs:
./compilebench -D /btrfs/compilebench -i 90
