Re: btrfs (was: raid5/6) production use status (and future)?

Hey.. Hm... so the overall btrfs state seems to be still pretty worrying, doesn't it? - RAID5/6 seems far from being stable or even usable,... not to talk   about higher parity levels, whose earlier posted patches (e.g.   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1654735) seem to have   been

Re: raid5/6 production use status?

Hey. I've lost a bit track recently and the wiki changelog doesn't seem to contain much about how things went on at the RAID5/6 front... so how're things going? Is it already more or less "productively" usable? What's still missing? Well, you still can't even check for free space. You

Re: raid5/6 production use status?

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:24:45AM +0200, Gerald Hopf wrote: > > >Hey. > > > >I've lost a bit track recently and the wiki changelog doesn't seem to > >contain much about how things went on at the RAID5/6 front... so how're > >things going? > > > >Is it already more or less "productively" usable?

Re: raid5/6 production use status?

Hey. I've lost a bit track recently and the wiki changelog doesn't seem to contain much about how things went on at the RAID5/6 front... so how're things going? Is it already more or less "productively" usable? What's still missing? Well, you still can't even check for free space. ~ # btrfs

raid5/6 production use status?

Hey. I've lost a bit track recently and the wiki changelog doesn't seem to contain much about how things went on at the RAID5/6 front... so how're things going? Is it already more or less "productively" usable? What's still missing? I guess there still aren't any administrative tools that e.g.