Hey..
Hm... so the overall btrfs state seems to be still pretty worrying,
doesn't it?
- RAID5/6 seems far from being stable or even usable,... not to talk
about higher parity levels, whose earlier posted patches (e.g.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1654735) seem to have
been giv
Hey.
I've lost a bit track recently and the wiki changelog doesn't seem to
contain much about how things went on at the RAID5/6 front... so how're
things going?
Is it already more or less "productively" usable? What's still missing?
Well, you still can't even check for free space.
You ca
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:24:45AM +0200, Gerald Hopf wrote:
>
> >Hey.
> >
> >I've lost a bit track recently and the wiki changelog doesn't seem to
> >contain much about how things went on at the RAID5/6 front... so how're
> >things going?
> >
> >Is it already more or less "productively" usable? W
Hey.
I've lost a bit track recently and the wiki changelog doesn't seem to
contain much about how things went on at the RAID5/6 front... so how're
things going?
Is it already more or less "productively" usable? What's still missing?
Well, you still can't even check for free space.
~ # btrfs
Hey.
I've lost a bit track recently and the wiki changelog doesn't seem to
contain much about how things went on at the RAID5/6 front... so how're
things going?
Is it already more or less "productively" usable? What's still missing?
I guess there still aren't any administrative tools that e.g. m