On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 09:26:59PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 09:28:51AM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote:
>>
>>> Upgraded the btrfs tree to 6-17 and all of the stability problems
>>> went away on the single disk system, so not sure if this was a code
worker memory is already freed on one fail path in btrfs_start_workers,
but is still dereferenced. Switch the dereference and kfree.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby
---
fs/btrfs/async-thread.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 02:45:39PM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> > This lets an administrator give non-root users access to the btrfs
> > transaction start/end ioctls via a mount option.
> >
> > Currently any process using the ioctls must run as root.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:41:49AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 09:26:59PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote:
> > 18:40:32 btrfs2 kernel: [ 4459.870613] sd 0:0:1:0: [sdb] Unhandled error
> > code
> > Jun 26 18:40:32 btrfs2 kernel: [ 4459.870640] sd 0:0:1:0: [sdb] Result:
> > hostb
Hi,
Recently, I've red btrfsck.c of btrfs-progs to study the internal of btrfs.
However, I may find typo in pick_next_pending() of btrfsck.c
The first index of bits[] which is initialized should be 0, I think.
Signed-off-by: TARUISI Hiroaki
---
diff --git a/btrfsck.c b/btrfsck.c
index 40c90f8..
Hi,
In verify_parent_transid() of disk-io.c (btrfs-progs), I found
redundant check.
---
static int verify_parent_transid(struct extent_io_tree *io_tree,
struct extent_buffer *eb, u64 parent_transid)
{
int ret;
if (!parent_transid || btrfs_header_ge
