When I try btrfsck in repair mode, it fails to fix the corruption (log
below). Is there any other version of btrfsck besides the one at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git that
I could try?
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/pp/btrfs-progs/btrfsck --repair /dev/m
The patchset enhanced btrfs qgroup show command.
Firstly, we restructure show_qgroups, make it easy to add new features.
And then we add '-p' '-c', '-l',and '-e' options to print the parent
qgroup id, child qgroup id, max referenced size and max exclusive size
of qgroup respectively, add '-F' and
From: Wang Shilong
The current show_qgroups() just shows a little information, and it is hard to
add some functions which the users need in the future, so i restructure it, make
it easy to add new functions.
In order to improve the scalability of show_qgroups(), i add some important
structures:
From: Wang Shilong
This patch introduces '-p' option to print the ID of the parent qgroups.
You may use it like:
btrfs qgroup show -p
For Example:
qgroupid(2/0)
/ \
/ \
/ \
qgroupid(1/0)
From: Wang Shilong
This patch introduces '-l' option to print max referenced size of qgroups.
You may use it like:
btrfs qgroup show -l
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie
---
cmds-qgroup.c | 9 +++--
qgroup.c | 7 +++
qgroup.h | 1 +
3 file
From: Wang Shilong
This patch introduce '-e' option to print max exclusive size of qgroups.
You may use it like this:
btrfs qgroup -e
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie
---
cmds-qgroup.c | 9 +++--
qgroup.c | 8
qgroup.h | 1 +
3 files
From: Wang Shilong
This patch introduces '-c' option to print the ID of the child qgroups.
You may use it like:
btrfs qgroup show -c
For Example:
qgroupid(2/0)
/ \
/ \
/ \
qgroupid(1/0)
From: Wang Shilong
This patch introduces '-F' option which can help you filter the qgroups
by the path name, you may use it like:
btrfs qgroup show -F
For example:
qgroupid(2/0)
/ \
/ \
From: Wang Shilong
This patch introduces '-f' option which can help you filter the qgroups
by the path name, you may use it like:
btrfs qgroup show -f
For example:
qgroupid(2/0)
/ \
/ \
From: Wang Shilong
You might want to list qgroups in order of some items, such as 'qgroupid',
'rfer'
and so on, you can use '--sort'. Now you can sort the qgroups by 'qgroupid',
'rfer','excl','max_rfer' and 'max_excl'.
For example:
If you want to list qgroups in order of 'qgroupid'.
You
From: Wang Shilong
This patch introduce '-t' option which can help you print the result
as a table.
You can use it like:
btrfs qgroup show -t
However, to table the result better, we make '-p' and '-c' not present
at the same time.If you still want to show both of them at the same time,
Hi, right now I own this SSD :
Intel SSD 520 Series MLC 120 Gigs
I'm using the latest firmware from Intel.
Also, this is my /etc/fstab
/dev/sda3 /bootext2 noauto,noatime,defaults
1 2
/dev/sda1 /boot/efivfatnoauto,defaults
0
Sylvain Alain wrote (ao):
> Hi, right now I own this SSD :
>
> Intel SSD 520 Series MLC 120 Gigs
> Also, this is my /etc/fstab
> /dev/sda3 /bootext2 noauto,noatime,defaults
> /dev/sda1 /boot/efivfatnoauto,defaults
> /dev/sda4 / btr
Hello,
Using the last couple of kernels (3.6 or 3.7), scrubbing my btrfs fs (which is
on a luks based lvm device) will always end up crashing my pc.
The error (screenshot: http://mathieu.csetco.com/btrfs-scrub-crash.jpeg) looks
very similar to this crash (that's why I'm Cc'ing Sami):
btr
Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 schrieb Sander:
> Sylvain Alain wrote (ao):
> > Hi, right now I own this SSD :
> >
> > Intel SSD 520 Series MLC 120 Gigs
>
> > Also, this is my /etc/fstab
> > /dev/sda3 /bootext2 noauto,noatime,defaults
> > /dev/sda1 /boot/efivfa
Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 schrieb Marc MERLIN:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 11:56:27PM -0500, Sylvain Alain wrote:
> > Hi everyone, I'm running btrfs since octobre 2012 and I would like to
> > understand 2 behavior that I noticed.
> >
> > 1. When I delete a big directory, sometimes it can hang
Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 schrieb Sander:
> > Sylvain Alain wrote (ao):
> > > Hi, right now I own this SSD :
> > >
> > > Intel SSD 520 Series MLC 120 Gigs
> >
> > > Also, this is my /etc/fstab
> > > /dev/sda3 /boot
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Hendrik Friedel wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> thanks for developing btrfsck!
> Now, I'd like to contribute -as far as I can. I'm not a developer, but I do
> have some linux-experience.
> I've been using btrfsck on two 3TB HDDs (mirrored) for a while now under
> Kernel 3.0.
Currently udev does not know about the device being removed from the
file system. This may result in the situation where we're unable to
mount the file system by UUID or by LABEL because the by-uuid and
by-label links may still point to the device which is no longer part of
the btrfs file system an
Martin Steigerwald wrote (ao):
> Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> > Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 schrieb Sander:
> > > Sylvain Alain wrote (ao):
> > > > Hi, right now I own this SSD :
> > > >
> > > > Intel SSD 520 Series MLC 120 Gigs
> > >
> > > > Also, this is my
It appears to be an issue with the initial sparse file allocation. When I
manually create 2GB datafiles using dd from /dev/zero, instead of allowing
MongoDB to allocate them as needed, compression seems to be working correctly.
-Original Message-
From: Liu Bo [mailto:bo.li@oracle.com
When we are not with inode_cache option, we won't reuse inode id, which
means all of inodes will own different inode id, thus we don't worry
about "reuse of inode id leads to log tree's corruption" thing.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1
22 matches
Mail list logo
