Hi,
Thanks for the replies.
As you both pointed out, I shouldn't have described the issue having
to do with hotplugging. I got confused by this use-case being somewhat
emphasized in the description of the bug I linked to. As for the
question of why I think that I got bitten by that bug in particu
Zoltán Ivánfi posted on Sun, 15 Oct 2017 10:30:52 +0200 as excerpted:
> You assumed correctly that what I really wanted to ask about was btrfs
> on SATA+USB, thanks for answering that questions as well. Based on your
> replies I feel assured that btrfs should not be affected by this
> particular i
May be then just add a comment at least at one of that functions?
Like:
/*
* Handle unaligned end, end is inclusive, so always unaligned
*/
Or something like:
/*
* It's obvious, kernel use paging, so range
* Almost always have aligned start like 0
* and unaligned end like 8192 - 1
*/
Or we
On 2017年10月15日 09:19, Cerem Cem ASLAN wrote:
`btrfs send | btrfs receive` removes NOCOW attributes. Is it a bug or
a feature? If it's a feature, how can we keep these attributes if we
need to?
It seems that, current send doesn't have support for extra inode flags.
Send can only send out c/m/
On 10/13/2017 01:27 PM, Duncan wrote:
Misono, Tomohiro posted on Wed, 11 Oct 2017 11:18:50 +0900 as excerpted:
Add 'btrfs remove missing-all' to remove all the missing devices at once
for improving usability.
Example:
sudo mkfs.btrfs -f -d raid1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdb3 /dev/sdb4
su
On 10/14/2017 04:51 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:38:50AM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 10.10.2017 20:53, Liu Bo wrote:
We've avoided data losing raid profile when doing balance, but it
turns out that deleting a device could also result in the same
problem
This fixes the
On 2017/10/13 14:27, Duncan wrote:
> Misono, Tomohiro posted on Wed, 11 Oct 2017 11:18:50 +0900 as excerpted:
>
>> Add 'btrfs remove missing-all' to remove all the missing devices at once
>> for improving usability.
>>
>> Example:
>> sudo mkfs.btrfs -f -d raid1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdb3 /dev/
On 2017/10/16 12:30, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>
> On 10/13/2017 01:27 PM, Duncan wrote:
>> Misono, Tomohiro posted on Wed, 11 Oct 2017 11:18:50 +0900 as excerpted:
>>
>>> Add 'btrfs remove missing-all' to remove all the missing devices at once
>>> for improving usability.
>>>
>>> Example:
>>> sudo
State the 'delete' is the alias of 'remove' as the man page says.
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono
Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi
---
cmds-device.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/cmds-device.c b/cmds-device.c
index 4337eb2..3b6b985 100644
--- a/cmds-device.c
+++
This patch updates help/document of "btrfs device remove" in two points:
1. Add explanation of 'missing' for 'device remove'. This is only
written in wikipage currently.
(https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Using_Btrfs_with_Multiple_Devices)
2. Add example of device removal in the man documen
This updates help/doc of "btrfs device remove".
First patch adds the explanation that delete is the alias of remove to help
message.
Second patch adds the description of "remove missing", which is currently only
written in wikipage, and example of device removal.
v1->v2:
split the patch and upd
On 10/14/2017 02:46 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 10:23:58PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
On 10/07/2017 07:56 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:56:59PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
On 10/05/2017 04:11 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 11:59:20PM +0800, Anand Jain
On 10/14/2017 02:47 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 11:59:19PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
From: Anand Jain
This patch provides helper functions to force a device to failed,
and we need it for the following reasons,
1) a. It can be reported that device has failed when it does and
On 10/16/2017 12:35 PM, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
On 2017/10/16 12:30, Anand Jain wrote:
On 10/13/2017 01:27 PM, Duncan wrote:
Misono, Tomohiro posted on Wed, 11 Oct 2017 11:18:50 +0900 as excerpted:
Add 'btrfs remove missing-all' to remove all the missing devices at once
for improving us
On 13.10.2017 21:08, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:06:57PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 11:39:21AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
>>> Currently running 'btrfs device delete' can end up with losing data raid
>>> profile (if any), this test is to reproduce the problem.
>>>
15 matches
Mail list logo
