Steps to reproduce:
# mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda8
# mount /dev/sda8 /mnt
# btrfs sub snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
# btrfs sub snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
# btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -p /mnt/snap2 -f /mnt/1
# dmesg
The problem is that we will sort clone roots(include @send_root), it
might push
We should gurantee that parent and clone roots can not be destroyed
during send, for this we have two ideas.
1.by holding @subvol_sem, this might be a nightmare, because it will
block all subvolumes deletion for a long time.
2.Miao pointed out we can reuse @send_in_progress, that mean we will
We may return early in btrfs_drop_snapshot(), we shouldn't
call btrfs_std_err() for this case, fix it.
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
Changelog v1-v2: cc stable
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
We will finish orphan cleanups during snapshot, so we don't
have to commit transaction here.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
Changelog v1-v2: none
---
fs/btrfs/send.c | 29 -
1 file changed, 29
Hi Neil,
On 01/07, NeilBrown wrote:
To do the same with up to six failures, it's now required some kind of sort
function.
So I would probably just make sure we always process the block is the right
order. Then sorting would be irrelevant.
But as I say, I haven't fiddled with the code,
On 2014/01/06 12:57 AM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
Did you align your partitions to accommodate for the 4K sector of the EARS?
I had, yes. I had to do a lot of research to get the array working
optimally. I didn't need to repartition the spare so this carried over
to its being used as an OS disk.
Hi Chris,
On 01/06, Chris Mason wrote:
Neat. The faila/failb were always my least favorite part of the btrfs
code ;) Did you test just raid5/6 or also the higher parity counts?
At this stage no real testing was made with btrfs.
The intention of this btrfs patch is mainly to get feedback on
I read different howtos on the wiki and oracle docs, but I can't get it
to work:
legolas:/mnt/btrfs_pool1# btrfs subvolume snapshot -r tmp tmp_read_only_new
Create a readonly snapshot of 'tmp' in './tmp_read_only_new'
legolas:/mnt/btrfs_pool1# sync
legolas:/mnt/btrfs_pool1# btrfs send
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:49:51AM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
I read different howtos on the wiki and oracle docs, but I can't get it
to work:
legolas:/mnt/btrfs_pool1# btrfs subvolume snapshot -r tmp tmp_read_only_new
Create a readonly snapshot of 'tmp' in './tmp_read_only_new'
On 01/06, joystick wrote:
Just by looking at the Subjects, it seems patch number 0/1 is
missing. It might have not gotten through to the lists, or be a
numbering mistake.
The patch files can be also downloaded from:
http://snapraid.sourceforge.net/linux/v2/
Sorry about that,
Does your code
Hi,
It seems that the patch was to big for some linux lists.
If you miss some patch files, you can download them also at:
http://snapraid.sourceforge.net/linux/v2/
Sorry about that.
Ciao,
Andrea
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to
This change adds infrastructure to allow for generic properties for
inodes. Properties are name/value pairs that can be associated with
inodes for different purposes. They are stored as xattrs with the
prefix btrfs.
Properties can be inherited - this means when a directory inode has
inheritable
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:52 AM, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 01:41:41PM +, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
This is a revised version of the original proposal/work from Alexander Block
to introduce a generic framework to set properties on btrfs filesystem
Jim Salter wrote (ao):
I tried a kernel upgrade with moderately disastrous
(non-btrfs-related) results this morning; after the kernel upgrade
Xorg was completely borked beyond my ability to get it working
properly again through any normal means. I do have hourly snapshots
being taken by cron,
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 05:16:35AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
This series consolidates the various cut'n'pasted Posix ACL implementations
into a single common one based on the -get_acl method Linus added a while
ago and a new -set_acl counterpart.
This remove ~1800 lines of code and
On 12/21/2013 03:56 AM, Wang Shilong wrote:
Hello Josef,
Though i know there are still problems related to qgroup(for example removing
snapshot
will beak qgroup accounting).I did a simple test about your patch..
# btrfs quota enable /mnt
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/data bs=4k count=102400
Hey Gents,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:46:58PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/6/14, 3:42 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 01/06/2014 04:32 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/6/14, 1:58 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
I was trying to reproduce something with fsx and I noticed that no matter
what
seed I
On 1/7/14, 2:01 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
Hey Gents,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:46:58PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/6/14, 3:42 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 01/06/2014 04:32 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/6/14, 1:58 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
I was trying to reproduce something with fsx and I
On 1/7/14, 2:10 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/7/14, 2:01 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
Hey Gents,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:46:58PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/6/14, 3:42 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 01/06/2014 04:32 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/6/14, 1:58 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
I was trying to
Thanks Fengguang. Final patch with added comment. BTW, fengguang
mentioned that git-am has trouble with the inline patch and quilt
import worked fine for him...
In btrfs_end_bio(), we increment bi_remaining if is_orig_bio. If not,
we restore the orig_bio but failed to increment
On 01/07/2014 03:10 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/7/14, 2:01 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
Hey Gents,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:46:58PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/6/14, 3:42 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 01/06/2014 04:32 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/6/14, 1:58 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
I was trying
A user had a fs where the objectid of an orphan item was not the actual orphan
item objectid. This screwed up fsck because the block has keys in the wrong
order, also the fs scanning stuff will freak out because we have an inode with
nlink 0 and no orphan item. So this patch is pretty big but is
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 12:15 -0800, Muthu Kumar wrote:
Thanks Fengguang. Final patch with added comment. BTW, fengguang
mentioned that git-am has trouble with the inline patch and quilt
import worked fine for him...
In btrfs_end_bio(), we increment bi_remaining if is_orig_bio.
For some reason we weren't exiting if there were errors in the extent tree,
which means we could have errors in just the extent tree and things like
xfstests would keep going because we completely throw away the return value.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik jba...@fb.com
---
cmds-check.c | 4
Hello,
I ran btrfsck on my volume with the repair option. When I re-run
it, I get the same errors as before.
It mounts without errors? So why then btrfsck/btrfs repair? What precipitated
the repair?
I don't know what caused the damage, but a check revealed this:
Checking filesystem on
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:10:15PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/7/14, 2:01 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
Hey Gents,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:46:58PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/6/14, 3:42 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 01/06/2014 04:32 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/6/14, 1:58 PM, Josef
On 01/07/2014 03:34 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
For some reason we weren't exiting if there were errors in the extent tree,
which means we could have errors in just the extent tree and things like
xfstests would keep going because we completely throw away the return value.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by:
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:59:18AM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
But I read a discuss about the use of boolean type, some developers suggested
us to use bitfields instead of bool, because the bitfields can work better,
and they are more flexible, less misuse than bool.
On 01/07/2014 03:40 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:10:15PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/7/14, 2:01 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
Hey Gents,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:46:58PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/6/14, 3:42 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 01/06/2014 04:32 PM, Eric Sandeen
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 16:17 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 01/07/2014 03:40 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:10:15PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/7/14, 2:01 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
Hey Gents,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:46:58PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/6/14, 3:42
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 4:36 PM, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 03:10:25PM +0100, Pascal VITOUX wrote:
---
cmds-filesystem.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/cmds-filesystem.c b/cmds-filesystem.c
index 1c1926b..979dbd9
Hello,
This message is to inform you that you have just received a cash
donation
of $460,000 from us. You are advised to write us an email once you get
this message through the following Email: dawesda...@hotmail.com for
more
information on how you can redeem your donated sum.
Best of luck.
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:34:10PM +, Duncan wrote:
IIRC someone also mentioned problems with autodefrag and an about 3/4 gig
systemd journal. My gut feeling (IOW, *NOT* benchmarked!) is that double-
digit MiB files should /normally/ be fine, but somewhere in the lower
triple digits,
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:35:04 +0800
, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On fri, 20 Dec 2013 05:30:48 -0800, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 12/19/2013 07:08 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
I'm sorry but I failed to reproduce the problem.
Btrfs/012 in xfstests has been run for serveral hours but nothing
happened.
Would you
34 matches
Mail list logo
