On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:51:23PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 02:24:45PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
Is thre anything I can try to unwedge or prevent this problem next time I
try?
Sysrq+w would be nice so I can see what everybody is doing. Thanks,
Sure thing.
Jon Nelson posted on Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:00:51 -0500 as excerpted:
Using openSUSE 13.1 on x86_64 which - as of this writing - is 3.11.10,
Would a more recent kernel than 3.11 have done me any good?
[Reordered the kernel question from below to here, where you reported the
running version.]
As
If we have directories with a pending move/rename operation, we must take into
account any orphan directories that got created before executing the pending
move/rename. Those orphan directories are directories with an inode number
higher
then the current send progress and that don't exist in the
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana fdman...@gmail.com
---
fs/btrfs/send.c |6 --
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c
index 6a1a343..2952889 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/send.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c
@@ -2004,7 +2004,6 @@ static int
Hello,
I have a file-system on which I cannot write anymore (no space left on
device, which is not true
root@homeserver:~/btrfs/integration/devel# df -h
DateisystemGröße Benutzt Verf. Verw% Eingehängt auf
/dev/sdd230G 24G 5,1G 83% /mnt/test1
)
About the filesystem:
Hendrik Friedel posted on Sat, 22 Mar 2014 19:13:48 +0100 as excerpted:
I have a file-system on which I cannot write anymore (no space left on
device, which is not true
root@homeserver:~/btrfs/integration/devel# df -h
DateisystemGröße Benutzt Verf. Verw% Eingehängt auf
/dev/sdd2
On 2014/03/21 07:29 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 12:02:06AM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 10:53:29AM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
You need to move /mnt/btrfs_pool2/tmp_read_only_new to a different
name as well. The send stream contains the name of the
On 2014/03/22 09:44 PM, Brendan Hide wrote:
On 2014/03/21 07:29 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
Hi, Marc
Feel free to use ideas from my own script. Some aspects in my script
are more mature and others are frankly pathetic. ;)
There are also quite a lot of TODOs throughout my script that aren't
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 09:44:05PM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
Hi, Marc
Feel free to use ideas from my own script. Some aspects in my script are
more mature and others are frankly pathetic. ;)
There are also quite a lot of TODOs throughout my script that aren't
likely to get the urgent
On 2014/03/22 10:00 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 09:44:05PM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
Hi, Marc
Feel free to use ideas from my own script. Some aspects in my script are
more mature and others are frankly pathetic. ;)
There are also quite a lot of TODOs throughout my script
After deleting a huge directory tree in my /home subvolume, syncing
snapshots now fails with:
ERROR: rmdir o1952777-157-0 failed. No such file or directory
Error line 156 with status 1
DIE: Code dump:
153 if [[ -n $init ]]; then
154 btrfs send $src_newsnap | $ssh btrfs receive
Please consider adding a blank line between quotes, it makes them just a bit
more readable :)
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:02:24PM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
- it doesn't create writeable snapshots on the destination in case you want
to use the copy as a live filesystem
One of the issues with
Hello,
thanks for your help, I appreciate your hint.
I think (reboot into the system with the fs mounted as root still
outstanding), it fixed my problem.
I read through the FAQ you mentioned, but I must admit, that I do not
fully understand.
What I am wondering about is, what caused this
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:47:18PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:51:23PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 02:24:45PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
Is thre anything I can try to unwedge or prevent this problem next time
I
try?
Sysrq+w would
This is just a rave-post to praise Duncan for his excellent post back to
Jon!
This will surely help a good number of new btrfs users who have the good
sense to watch this mailing list. Your exposition on the balance command
helped to clarify in my mind exactly why someone might want to use
Duncan 1i5t5.duncan at cox.net writes:
Jon Nelson posted on Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:00:51 -0500 as excerpted:
Using openSUSE 13.1 on x86_64 which - as of this writing - is 3.11.10,
Would a more recent kernel than 3.11 have done me any good?
[Reordered the kernel question from below to here,
Hendrik Friedel posted on Sat, 22 Mar 2014 22:16:27 +0100 as excerpted:
I read through the FAQ you mentioned, but I must admit, that I do not
fully understand.
My experience is that it takes a bit of time to soak in. Between time,
previous Linux experience, and reading this list for awhile,
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 06:21:02PM -0500, Jon Nelson wrote:
Duncan 1i5t5.duncan at cox.net writes:
Jon Nelson posted on Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:00:51 -0500 as excerpted:
[snip]
Below are the btrfs fi df / and btrfs fi show.
turnip:~ # btrfs fi df /
Data, single: total=1.80TiB,
18 matches
Mail list logo
