Russell Coker posted on Fri, 02 May 2014 11:48:07 +1000 as excerpted:
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Am I missing something or is it impossible to do a disk replace on BTRFS
right now?
I can delete a device, I can add a device, but I'd like to replace a
device.
Thanks for the response, Duncan.
On 01/05/14 17:58, Duncan wrote:
Tho you are slightly outdated on your btrfs-progs version, 3.14.1 being
current. But I think the code in question is kernel code and the progs
simply report it, so I don't think that can be the problem in this case.
Yes,
On 02/05/14 10:23, Duncan wrote:
Russell Coker posted on Fri, 02 May 2014 11:48:07 +1000 as excerpted:
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
[snip]
http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1987/CSD-87-391.pdf
Whether a true RAID-1 means just 2 copies or N copies is a
Hi all,
I completed a full scrub:
root@nasbak:/home/jpieroen# btrfs scrub status /home/
scrub status for 7ca5f38e-308f-43ab-b3ea-31b3bcd11a0d
scrub started at Wed Apr 30 08:30:19 2014 and finished after 144131 seconds
total bytes scrubbed: 4.76TiB with 0 errors
Then tried to remove a device:
Hello,
I have a problem with a server with Fedora 20 and BTRFS. This server had
frequent hard restarts before the filesystem got corrupt and we are unable to
boot it.
We have a HP Proliant server with 4 disks @1TB each and Software RAID 5.
It had Debian installed (i don't know the version) and
Jaap Pieroen posted on Fri, 02 May 2014 11:42:35 +0200 as excerpted:
I completed a full scrub:
root@nasbak:/home/jpieroen# btrfs scrub status /home/
scrub status for 7ca5f38e-308f-43ab-b3ea-31b3bcd11a0d
scrub started at Wed Apr 30 08:30:19 2014
and finished after 144131 seconds
total bytes
Hello,
2014-05-02 17:42 GMT+08:00 Jaap Pieroen j...@pieroen.nl:
Hi all,
I completed a full scrub:
root@nasbak:/home/jpieroen# btrfs scrub status /home/
scrub status for 7ca5f38e-308f-43ab-b3ea-31b3bcd11a0d
scrub started at Wed Apr 30 08:30:19 2014 and finished after 144131 seconds
total
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 07:38:00PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 04/30/2014 03:37 PM, David Taylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Frank Kingswood wrote:
On 30/04/14 13:11, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:39:27PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
I found a bit unclear
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 05:40:48PM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
This increases the send stream version from version 1 to version 2, adding
2 new commands:
1) total data size - used to tell the receiver how much file data the stream
will add or update;
2) fallocate - used to
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:40:03PM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
So that applications can find out what's the highest send stream
version supported/implemented by the running kernel:
$ cat /sys/fs/btrfs/send/stream_version
2
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:46 PM, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:40:03PM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
So that applications can find out what's the highest send stream
version supported/implemented by the running kernel:
$ cat
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:07:58PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
'bio_index' is just a index, it's really not necessary to do increment
one by one.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com
Reviewed-by: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Duncan 1i5t5.duncan at cox.net writes:
To those that know the details, this tells the story.
Btrfs raid5/6 modes are not yet code-complete, and scrub is one of the
incomplete bits. btrfs scrub doesn't know how to deal with raid5/6
properly just yet.
While the operational bits of
Shilong Wang wangshilong1991 at gmail.com writes:
Hello,
There is a known RAID5/6 bug, i sent a patch to address this problem.
Could you please double check if your kernel source includes the
following commit:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?
On May 2, 2014, at 2:23 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Something tells me btrfs replace (not device replace, simply replace)
should be moved to btrfs device replace…
The syntax for btrfs device is different though; replace is like balance:
btrfs balance start and btrfs replace
and click on details. Click the green link
under descendants livecd. And then under Output listing you'll see an ISO you
can download, the one there right now is
Fedora-Live-Desktop-x86_64-rawhide-20140502.iso - but of course this changes
daily.
You might want to boot with kernel parameter
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 01:21:50PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On May 2, 2014, at 2:23 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Something tells me btrfs replace (not device replace, simply replace)
should be moved to btrfs device replace…
The syntax for btrfs device is different though;
On May 2, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 01:21:50PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On May 2, 2014, at 2:23 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Something tells me btrfs replace (not device replace, simply replace)
should be moved to btrfs
Jaap Pieroen posted on Fri, 02 May 2014 17:48:13 + as excerpted:
Duncan 1i5t5.duncan at cox.net writes:
To those that know the details, this tells the story.
Btrfs raid5/6 modes are not yet code-complete, and scrub is one of the
incomplete bits. btrfs scrub doesn't know how to deal
19 matches
Mail list logo
