Forgot to mention that these btrfs partitions reside on an LVM.
2014-05-11 7:56 GMT+02:00 Ronald ronald...@gmail.com:
Dear btrfs developers,
Since v3.14, it has occasionally hapenned that reading some files from
a btrfs partition cause the process to hang. Right, a file has been
located that
Hi,
I created a RAID10 array of 4x 4TB disks and later added another 4x 3TB disks,
expecting the result to be the same level of fault tolerance however with
simply more capacity. Recently I noticed the output of 'btrfs fi df' lists the
Data layout as 'single' and not RAID10 per my initial
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 02:16:27PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
One of the problems with ReiserFS was that a fsck --rebuild-tree would look
through all the disk contents for blocks that appeared to be metadata. A
hostile user could create a file in their home directory (or /tmp or anywhere
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 05:53:40PM +1000, brett.k...@commandict.com.au wrote:
Hi,
I created a RAID10 array of 4x 4TB disks and later added another 4x
3TB disks, expecting the result to be the same level of fault
tolerance however with simply more capacity. Recently I noticed the
output of
Below is the output of running a balance a few times on a 120G SSD.
It seems that whenever I set the metadata usage to be greater than 0 it will
report relocating something, regardless of whether that's possible.
root@server:~# btrfs fi balance start -dusage=0 -musage=0 /
Done, had to relocate
On Sun, 11 May 2014, Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote:
Below is the output of running a balance a few times on a 120G SSD.
Sorry forgot to mention that's kernel 3.14.1 Debian package.
--
My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Bloghttp://doc.coker.com.au/
--
To
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the report, I've figured it out and will send a fix.
This bug is caused by the part of cleanup code of
commit cb517eabba4f109810dba2e5f37b0dcf22103065(Btrfs: cleanup the similar code
of the fs root read)
thanks,
-liubo
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 08:08:28PM -0600, Chris
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk
To: brett.k...@commandict.com.au
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Sun, 11 May 2014 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: RAID10 across different sized disks shows data layout as single
not RAID10
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 05:53:40PM +1000,
First, my apologies for the broken threads, I had one message where I
updated the subject line, but it got cut in two and sent part of the
headers in the body :(
(operator mistake, sorry)
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 02:28:23AM +, Duncan wrote:
That's a fair point but I run scrub every day with
On 2014-05-09 20:01, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:58:27PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 08:02:45PM +0200, laie wrote:
Now I'm looking for a way to tell btrfs to provide me with a list of the
corrupted files and delete them afterwards. This would be great,
On 2014/05/11 11:52 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2014, Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote:
Below is the output of running a balance a few times on a 120G SSD.
Sorry forgot to mention that's kernel 3.14.1 Debian package.
Please send the output of the two following command:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:16:59AM +0200, laie wrote:
On 2014-05-09 20:01, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:58:27PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 08:02:45PM +0200, laie wrote:
Now I'm looking for a way to tell btrfs to provide me with a list of the
corrupted
Same as normal devices, seed devices should be initialized with
fs_info-dev_root as well, otherwise we'll get a NULL pointer crash.
Cc: Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com
Reported-by: Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 12
Russell Coker posted on Sun, 11 May 2014 19:43:16 +1000 as excerpted:
Below is the output of running a balance a few times on a 120G SSD.
It seems that whenever I set the metadata usage to be greater than 0 it
will report relocating something, regardless of whether that's possible.
Why
find_good_parent() uses assert to deal with the problem that clone
source's parent can't be found.
But in fact the assert is somewhat overkilled since subvol_uuid_search()
has enough error messages for debug and caller of find_good_parent() can
handle the problems in find_good_parent(), so the
This patch posted a long time back should fix it.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/33276
Could you test it ?
Thanks, Anand
On 05/11/2014 09:51 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
kernel 3.15.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc21.x86_64
btrfs-progs 3.14
/dev/sdb2 = existing btrfs fs
/dev/sdc3 =
On Fri, 9 May 2014, Josef Bacik jba...@fb.com wrote:
On 05/08/2014 05:50 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
I've got a server/workstation (KDE desktop and file server) running
kernel 3.14.1 from the Debian package 3.14-trunk-amd64.
It was running well until I decided to do a full balance of the
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 03:21:09PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:56:32PM +0800, Guangliang Zhao wrote:
Even CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL is not defined, the acl still could
been enabled using a mount option, and now fs/btrfs/acl.o is not
built, so the mount options will
Even CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL is not defined, the acl still could
been enabled using a mount option, and now fs/btrfs/acl.o is not
built, so the mount options will appear to be supported but will
be silently ignored.
Signed-off-by: Guangliang Zhao lucienc...@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: David Sterba
According to commit 865ffef3797da2cac85b3354b5b6050dc9660978
(fs: fix fsync() error reporting),
it's not stable to just check error pages because pages can be
truncated or invalidated, we should also mark mapping with error
flag so that a later fsync can catch the error.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
20 matches
Mail list logo
