Mitch Harder posted on Sat, 09 Aug 2014 23:57:19 -0500 as excerpted:
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
So by the time of actual .0 release, [the kernel] really is quite
stable, and no longer development kernel.
I can't say I've observed that to be the case
Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa posted on Sat, 09 Aug 2014 22:58:37 -0500 as
excerpted:
Do you think I will have better luck with 3.16? or maybe it is that this
filesystem has so many errors (remember the btrfs check output) that it
will take a really long time to mount because it is trying to
Jose, I add my 50 cents,
i know, what you want backup data from raid through network and what
you have only 11 TB data from 40 TB fs
As i now, you can safety resize btrfs fs, without btrfs fi resize,
something like that:
$ btrfs fi df /
Data, single: total=81.00GiB, used=60.33GiB
System, DUP:
Timofey Titovets posted on Sun, 10 Aug 2014 11:50:39 +0300 as excerpted:
Jose, I add my 50 cents,
i know, what you want backup data from raid through network and what you
have only 11 TB data from 40 TB fs As i now, you can safety resize btrfs
fs, without btrfs fi resize, something like that:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 12:43:31PM +, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 11:21:13 -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
I sure hope that deadlock patch is going to be added to the 3.16.x tree,
I'm not super stocked with being stuck at 3.14.
Let me try to re-stoke your enthusiasm a bit
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 10:02:15AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On 08/07/2014 04:20 AM, Miao Xie wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 15:50:30 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
[90496.156016] kworker/u8:14 D 880044e38540 0 21050 2
0x
[90496.157683] Workqueue: btrfs-delalloc
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 03:42:09PM +, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 07:39:00 -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
My apologies if I missed some Emails, but I'm a bit confused.
The deadlocks happen reliably with 3.15+, but those patches are marked as
being for 3.14 in your URL, but
Am Dienstag, 5. August 2014, 14:58:34 schrieb Clemens Eisserer:
Hi Russel,
The Debian installer has BTRFS in a list of filesystems to choose with no
special notice about it. I'm thinking of filing a Debian bug requesting
that they put a warning against it.
As long as it is not
Am Montag, 4. August 2014, 11:09:23 schrieb Peter Waller:
On 4 August 2014 10:39, Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:14:19 AM Peter Waller wrote:
All of this is *very* surprising.
Hmm, it shouldn't be, the ENOSPC issues are well known and have been
discussed
Hello,
I came across the to-do list at
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas and would like to know if
this list is updated and recent.
I am looking for a project idea for my under graduate degree which can be
completed in around 3-4 months. Are there any suggestions and ideas
On Aug 7, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
# btrfs send /mnt/320G/2012april_HDD_fullbackup.ro.0/ | btrfs receive
/mnt/500G/
At subvol /mnt/320G/2012april_HDD_fullbackup.ro.0/
At subvol 2012april_HDD_fullbackup.ro.0
ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot
Maximum xattr size can be up to nearly the leaf size. For an fs with a
leaf size larger than the page size, using kmalloc requires allocating
multiple pages that are contiguous, which might not be possible if
there's heavy memory fragmentation. Therefore fallback to vmalloc if
we fail to allocate
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Aug 7, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
# btrfs send /mnt/320G/2012april_HDD_fullbackup.ro.0/ | btrfs receive
/mnt/500G/
At subvol /mnt/320G/2012april_HDD_fullbackup.ro.0/
At
Sigh I can only top post from my phone. Instead of using contig_bug just use
is_vmalloc_addr. Thanks,
Josef
Filipe Manana fdman...@suse.com wrote:
Maximum xattr size can be up to nearly the leaf size. For an fs with a
leaf size larger than the page size, using kmalloc requires allocating
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Josef Bacik jba...@fb.com wrote:
Sigh I can only top post from my phone. Instead of using contig_bug just use
is_vmalloc_addr. Thanks,
Thanks Josef, I wasn't aware of that helper function.
Josef
Filipe Manana fdman...@suse.com wrote:
Maximum xattr
Good time of day,
According to https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas#btrfs
Quote:
merge functionality of btrfstune, eg. under btrfs dev set-seed /dev/
(discuss the command name though)
This patch is just code move
After, user can tune btrfs parameters through:
btrfs dev tune
Maximum xattr size can be up to nearly the leaf size. For an fs with a
leaf size larger than the page size, using kmalloc requires allocating
multiple pages that are contiguous, which might not be possible if
there's heavy memory fragmentation. Therefore fallback to vmalloc if
we fail to allocate
Sorry one more thing, just do krealloc instead of the kfrww+kmalloc. Thanks,
Josef
Filipe Manana fdman...@suse.com wrote:
Maximum xattr size can be up to nearly the leaf size. For an fs with a
leaf size larger than the page size, using kmalloc requires allocating
multiple pages that are
Maximum xattr size can be up to nearly the leaf size. For an fs with a
leaf size larger than the page size, using kmalloc requires allocating
multiple pages that are contiguous, which might not be possible if
there's heavy memory fragmentation. Therefore fallback to vmalloc if
we fail to allocate
Maximum xattr size can be up to nearly the leaf size. For an fs with a
leaf size larger than the page size, using kmalloc requires allocating
multiple pages that are contiguous, which might not be possible if
there's heavy memory fragmentation. Therefore fallback to vmalloc if
we fail to allocate
From: Satoru Takeuchi takeuchi_sat...@jp.fujitsu.com
- Add missing description about -R option in the command
usage of btrfs scrub resume.
- Add missing comma to avoid the following misformatted command
usage of btrfs scrub start. See the line of -R option.
===
usage: btrfs scrub start
From: Satoru Takeuchi takeuchi_sat...@jp.fujitsu.com
Fix the lack of description of --max-erros option in
both man and command usage of btrfs receive.
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi takeuchi_sat...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
Documentation/btrfs-receive.txt | 2 +-
cmds-receive.c | 4
On 08/10/2014 03:21 PM, Vimal A R wrote:
Hello,
I came across the to-do list at
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas and would like to know
if this list is updated and recent.
I am looking for a project idea for my under graduate degree which can be
completed in
Can you try the following patch and confirm if it helps?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4705171/
This one applies without problems, I didn't build it because I saw v4. The v4
patch I get:
+ patch -p1 -F1 -s
4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/btrfs/send.c.rej
Should
24 matches
Mail list logo
