On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Fabian Frederick f...@skynet.be wrote:
This patch fixes mips compilation warning:
Actually it happens on all 32-bit platforms (where size_t is unsigned int).
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c: In function 'btrfs_check_super_valid':
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3927:21: warning: format
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 15:18:40 +, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
What works is the very first balance after the mkfs - it successfully
changes from the initial default dup to single, but subsequent balances
don't work. They also don't really fail.
Bisection found that commit
We can get into inconsistency between inodes and directory entries
after fsyncing a directory. The issue is that while a directory gets
the new dentries persisted in the fsync log and replayed at mount time,
the link count of the inode that directory entries point to doesn't
get updated, staying
On 02/20/2015 12:50 AM, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
* As at Linux 3.20, this option is supported only on ext4.
As of Linux 3.20 is more correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo
kernel: 3.18.7 + all patches since 3.19 + the daily Filipe ;)
For the last few days I've been getting an awful lot of stuck tasks
after mundane operations like simple rsync'ing, an fallocate or just
doign a manual sync.
Symptom is always 100% CPU use and the task (user-space fallocate, sync
or
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:51:09AM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
If io_ctl_prepare_pages fails, the pages in io_ctl.pages are not valid.
When we try to access them later, things will blow up in various ways.
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval
On 02/20/2015 01:03 PM, Bob Williams wrote:
/var/lib/btrfs/scrub.status.0b07b829-9a0e-44ab-89ee-14b36a45199e
(the last bit of the filename is the filesystem uuid)
Look for a line that ends with finished:0 and change it to say
finished:1
Why does this data item even exist? The
Hi everyone,
now that RAID5 support is coming along nicely with Kernel 3.19 I decided
it's time to switch from XFS to btrfs for my storage server. And yes, I
do have backups.
I'm using 5x WD 4TB RED Drives connected to the Intel SATA Controller
(Intel H87 Chipset). I'm running Kernel 3.19
On 2015/02/22 03:02, Dave Stevens wrote:
If there's a better list please say so.
Either way, there is definitely not enough information here for us to
give any practical advice. This is a btrfs-related mailing list and
there's no indication even that you are using btrfs as your filesystem.
Original Message
Subject: create subvolume defining id
From: Johan Kröckel johan.kroec...@gmail.com
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Date: 2015年02月19日 19:11
Is it possible to create a subvolume and define the id?
What do you mean by the word id?
Did you mean subvolid or
Hi, Chris Mason
* From: Chris Mason [mailto:c...@fb.com]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:00 AM
To: linux-btrfs; Zhao Lei; dste...@suse.cz
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix allocation size calculations in alloc_btrfs_bio
Since commit 8e5cfb55d3f (Btrfs: Make raid_map array be inlined in
11 matches
Mail list logo
