Are both of these meant to be public libraries, installed on the user
systems, and available in .so variant as well for 3rd party
development and public dynamic linking?
Or are these private internal libraries, which are installed as public
runtime only, simply to share code between the utils, but
On 14 May 2018 at 21:22, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 09:40:19AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> Are both of these meant to be public libraries, installed on the user
>> systems, and available in .so variant as well for 3rd party
>> development and p
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784911
Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov
---
fsck.btrfs | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fsck.btrfs b/fsck.btrfs
index f056a7f..3a92804 100755
--- a/fsck.btrfs
+++ b/fsck.btrfs
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ if
On 15 May 2015 at 21:28, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784911
> Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov
> ---
> fsck.btrfs | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fsck.btrfs b/fsck.
First fix == bashism, as that is not accepted by e.g. Debian/Ubuntu
dash.
Secondly shift OPTIND, such that last parameter is checked to exist.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov
---
fsck.btrfs | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fsck.btrfs b/fsck.btrfs
index
On 11 June 2015 at 02:50, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 6/10/15 7:10 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:55:05PM +0200, pu...@xs4all.nl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've noticed this "@" sign in the subvolume's path with SLES12.
>>> I'm wond
On 5 December 2014 at 15:32, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
> wrote:
>>
>> On 30 November 2014 at 22:31, cwillu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> In ubuntu, the initfs runs a btrfs dev scan, which should catch
>>&g
On 11 December 2014 at 12:37, Holger Hoffstätte
wrote:
>
> David,
>
> I was wondering if you could please send out announcements for btrfs-progs
> when you tag a release or -rc? There doesn't seem to be a good mechanism
> to track releases and IMHO the more people are notified, the more
> testing
ent struct stat from
other files (cmds-replace.c).
This patch thus cleans up all feature defines, and sets them at a
consistent level.
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747969
Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov
---
Makefile | 2 +-
btrfs-calc-size.c | 2
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/539433
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/583768
Authors:
Luca Bruno
Alexander Kurtz
Daniel Baumann
Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov
---
btrfs-convert.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/btrfs-convert.c b/btrfs
From: Shawn Landen
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/656955
Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov
---
ctree.h | 18 ++
volumes.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ctree.h b/ctree.h
index fa73c4a..92c6ad3 100644
--- a/ctree.h
+++ b
From: Luk Claes
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/554059
Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov
---
Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index e721e99..441e925 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ TESTS = fsck-tests.sh
Inspect arguments, if we are not called as btrfs, then assume we are
called to act like fsck.
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/712078
Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov
---
btrfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/btrfs.c b/btrfs.c
index e83349c..e8a87ac
On 21 September 2014 13:59, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
wrote:
> On 21 September 2014 03:01, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>>
>> Inspect arguments, if we are not called as btrfs, then assume we are
>> called to act like fsck.
> [...]
>> - if (!strcmp(bname, "btrfs
Hello,
On 30 November 2014 at 17:43, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this patch provides a "mount.btrfs" helper for the mount command.
> A btrfs filesystem could span several disks. This helper scans all the
> partitions to discover all the disks required to mount a filesystem.
> So it w
On 30 November 2014 at 22:31, cwillu wrote:
>
> In ubuntu, the initfs runs a btrfs dev scan, which should catch
> anything that would be missed there.
>
I'm sorry, udev rule(s) is not sufficient in the initramfs-less case,
as outlined.
In case of booting with initramfs, indeed, both Debian & Ubu
On 30 November 2014 at 22:59, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
>>Agree with others about -C 256...-C sha256 is only three
>>letters more ;)
>
> Ideally, sha2-256 would be used, since there will be (are) other
> versions of sha which have 256 bits size.
>
Nope, we should use standard names. SHA-2 2
17 matches
Mail list logo
