On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:19 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> No more.
>
> The dump is already good enough for me to dig for some time.
>
> We don't usually get such large extent tree dump from a real world use case.
>
> It would help us in several ways, from determine how fragmented a block
> group is
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:04 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年02月13日 18:21, John Ettedgui wrote:
>> Hello there,
>>
>> have you found anything good since then?
>
> Unfortunately, not really much to speed it up.
Oh :/
>
> This reminds me of the old (an
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:40 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年02月13日 19:25, John Ettedgui wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:04 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The problem is not about how much space it takes, but how many extents
>&g
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 4:46 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年02月13日 20:06, John Ettedgui wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> That's fairly straightforward to do, though it should be quite slow so
>>>> I'd hope not to have to do that too often.
>>&
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> Hi John,
> Thanks for the trace output.
You are welcome, thank you for looking at it!
>
> But it seems that, your root partition is also btrfs, causing a lot of btrfs
> trace from your systemd journal.
>
Oh yes sorry about that.
I actually ha
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
>
> It seems that you're using Chromium while doing the dump. :)
>
Ooops I did not think that would be an issue :/
> If no CD drive, I'll recommend to use Archlinux installation iso to make a
> bootable USB stick and do the dump.
> (just down
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:45 PM, John Ettedgui wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>> It seems that you're using Chromium while doing the dump. :)
>> If no CD drive, I'll recommend to use Archlinux installation iso to make a
>&g
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
> Oh, you were using trace-cmd, that's why the data is so huge.
Oh, I thought it was just automating the work for me, but without any
sort of impact.
>
> I was originally hoping you just copy the trace file, which is human
> readable and not so hu
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:55 PM, John Ettedgui wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>> Oh, you were using trace-cmd, that's why the data is so huge.
> Oh, I thought it was just automating the work for me, but without any
> sort of impact.
>>
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Oh, converted...
> That's too bad. :(
>
> [[What's wrong with convert]]
> Although btrfs is flex enough in theory to fit itself into the free space of
> ext* and works fine,
> But in practice, ext* is too fragmental in the standard of btrfs, not t
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:28 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> On 2015-08-04 00:58, John Ettedgui wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>
>>> Although the best practice is staying away from such converted fs, either
>>> using pur
11 matches
Mail list logo
