On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:55 PM, John Ettedgui <john.etted...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Qu Wenruo <quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: >> >> Oh, you were using trace-cmd, that's why the data is so huge. > Oh, I thought it was just automating the work for me, but without any > sort of impact. >> >> I was originally hoping you just copy the trace file, which is human >> readable and not so huge. > If you mean something like the ouput of trace-cmd report, it was > actually bigger than the dat files (about twice the size) that's why I > shared the dats instead. > If you want the reports instead I'll gladly share them. In case it helps here are the reports instead of the dats: https://mega.co.nz/#!FwpwHQyL!m0dQHSfQSNGzw9yUwJ6l0eb7Mzta0pOSAf1JHDZ1zfo https://mega.co.nz/#!B1JgXLxZ!oI1bm0RyhqFbkCWnT95GNKohGozmvqxgJDSUtVdo77s
I guess once compressed the size difference is meaningless Thanks, John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
