Just following up - the replace operation completed successfully and then the
source device (/dev/sdb) was removed, with all chunks moved on the target
(/dev/sdj). Putting it down to RAID level complexities I guess.
[root@array ~]# btrfs replace status -1 /export/archive/
Started on 15.Oct
Hi All,
I am noticing some strange numbers when replacing a disk under RAID1:
[root@array ~]# btrfs replace status -1 /export/archive/
367.2% done, 0 write errs, 0 uncorr. read errs
The filesystem is currently at 6x 6TB + 2x 5TB, replacing the first of each 5TB
with 8TB units:
[root@array ~]#
Thanks Henk,
That's encouraging and what I suspected - everything looks fine (even some
bitrot picked up through read error corrections on checksum failures, hurray!)
and yes I'll resize the new device once it completes.
[root@array ~]# btrfs replace status -1 /export/archive/
547.9% done, 0
-Original message-
From: Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk
Sent: Fri 01-23-2015 08:48 pm
Subject:Re: Recovery Operation With Multiple Devices
Attachment: signature.asc
To: Brett King brett.k...@commandict.com.au;
CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org;
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015
Hi All,
Just wondering how 'btrfs recovery' operates, when the source device given is
one of many in an MD array - I can't find anything documentation beyond a
single device use case.
Does it automatically include all devices in the relevant MD array as occurs
when mounting, or does it only
-Original message-
From: Brett King brett.k...@commandict.com.au
Sent: Wed 01-21-2015 09:26 am
Subject:RE: Recovery options for FS forced readonly due to 3.17
snapshot bug
CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org;
To: fdman...@gmail.com;
From: Filipe David Manana fdman
Hi,
I created a RAID10 array of 4x 4TB disks and later added another 4x 3TB disks,
expecting the result to be the same level of fault tolerance however with
simply more capacity. Recently I noticed the output of 'btrfs fi df' lists the
Data layout as 'single' and not RAID10 per my initial
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk
To: brett.k...@commandict.com.au
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Sun, 11 May 2014 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: RAID10 across different sized disks shows data layout as single
not RAID10
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 05:53:40PM +1000,
