On 2014/05/21 06:15 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
[snip]
Further on top of your check_missing patch I am writing
code to to handle disk reappear. I should be sending them
all soon.
Disk reappear problem is also reproduce here.
I am intersting about how will your patch to deal with.
Is your patch
I'm sorry to bother your but it has been about 2 weeks after your last
reply.
Is there any problem?
Thanks,
Qu
Original Message
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] btrfs: Add missing device check in
dev_info/rm_dev ioctl
From: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
To: Qu Wenruo quwen
Hi Qu,
Either we need to determine missing disk when disk disappear
or when we hit by -ENODEV during IO.
Discovering the same at the time when user run
'btrfs fi show' or 'btrfs dev del', is just not correct.
You might use interface as proposed here.
[PATCH RFC] btrfs: revamp
.
Thanks, Anand
On 21/05/14 11:12, Qu Wenruo wrote:
I'm sorry to bother your but it has been about 2 weeks after your last
reply.
Is there any problem?
Thanks,
Qu
Original Message
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] btrfs: Add missing device check in
dev_info/rm_dev ioctl
From: Anand
Original Message
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] btrfs: Add missing device check in
dev_info/rm_dev ioctl
From: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
To: Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com
Date: 2014年05月21日 11:54
Hi Qu,
Thanks for checking with me. sorry for the delay
Thanks for working on this.
I am running some tests will let you know.
Anand
On 05/06/2014 02:33 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Old btrfs can't find a missing btrfs device since there is no
mechanism for block layer to inform fs layer.
But we can use a workaround that only check status(by using
Original Message
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] btrfs: Add missing device check in
dev_info/rm_dev ioctl
From: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
To: Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com
Date: 2014年05月07日 16:00
Thanks for working on this.
I am running some tests will let you know
Old btrfs can't find a missing btrfs device since there is no
mechanism for block layer to inform fs layer.
But we can use a workaround that only check status(by using
request_queue-queue_flags) of every device in a btrfs
filesystem when calling dev_info/rm_dev ioctl, since other ioctls
do not
