On Sun, 11 May 2014 16:11:56 Brendan Hide wrote:
On 2014/05/11 11:52 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2014, Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote:
Below is the output of running a balance a few times on a 120G SSD.
Sorry forgot to mention that's kernel 3.14.1 Debian package.
Russell Coker posted on Tue, 13 May 2014 17:57:00 +1000 as excerpted:
The pathological case is where you have a chunk that is 1% full and
*every* other in-use chunk on the device is 100% full. In that
situation, a balance will simply move that data into a new chunk (which
will only ever reach
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 04:11:56PM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
On 2014/05/11 11:52 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2014, Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote:
Below is the output of running a balance a few times on a 120G SSD.
Sorry forgot to mention that's kernel 3.14.1 Debian
Below is the output of running a balance a few times on a 120G SSD.
It seems that whenever I set the metadata usage to be greater than 0 it will
report relocating something, regardless of whether that's possible.
root@server:~# btrfs fi balance start -dusage=0 -musage=0 /
Done, had to relocate
On Sun, 11 May 2014, Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote:
Below is the output of running a balance a few times on a 120G SSD.
Sorry forgot to mention that's kernel 3.14.1 Debian package.
--
My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Bloghttp://doc.coker.com.au/
--
To
On 2014/05/11 11:52 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2014, Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote:
Below is the output of running a balance a few times on a 120G SSD.
Sorry forgot to mention that's kernel 3.14.1 Debian package.
Please send the output of the two following command:
Russell Coker posted on Sun, 11 May 2014 19:43:16 +1000 as excerpted:
Below is the output of running a balance a few times on a 120G SSD.
It seems that whenever I set the metadata usage to be greater than 0 it
will report relocating something, regardless of whether that's possible.
Why
