On 13/02/14 18:02, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2014-02-13 12:33, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 13, 2014, at 1:50 AM, Frank Kingswood fr...@kingswood-consulting.co.uk
wrote:
On 12/02/14 17:13, Saint Germain wrote:
Ok based on your advices, here is what I have done so far to use UEFI
(remeber
On 2014-02-13 12:33, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 13, 2014, at 1:50 AM, Frank Kingswood
fr...@kingswood-consulting.co.uk wrote:
On 12/02/14 17:13, Saint Germain wrote:
Ok based on your advices, here is what I have done so far to use UEFI
(remeber that the objective is to have a clean and
On Feb 13, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn ahferro...@gmail.com wrote:
While this is what the UEFI spec says is supposed to be the fallback,
many systems don't actually look there unless the media is removable.
All of my UEFI systems instead look for Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi as
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:43:08 -0700, Chris Murphy
li...@colorremedies.com wrote :
sda3 = 1 TiB root partition (BTRFS), mounted on /
sda4 = 6 GiB swap partition
(that way I should be able to be compatible with both CSM or UEFI)
B) normal Debian installation on sdas, activate the CSM on
On 12/02/14 17:13, Saint Germain wrote:
Ok based on your advices, here is what I have done so far to use UEFI
(remeber that the objective is to have a clean and simple BTRFS RAID1
install).
A) I start first with only one drive, I have gone with the following
partition scheme (Debian wheezy,
On 13 February 2014 09:50, Frank Kingswood
fr...@kingswood-consulting.co.uk wrote:
On 12/02/14 17:13, Saint Germain wrote:
Ok based on your advices, here is what I have done so far to use UEFI
(remeber that the objective is to have a clean and simple BTRFS RAID1
install).
A) I start first
On Feb 13, 2014, at 1:50 AM, Frank Kingswood fr...@kingswood-consulting.co.uk
wrote:
On 12/02/14 17:13, Saint Germain wrote:
Ok based on your advices, here is what I have done so far to use UEFI
(remeber that the objective is to have a clean and simple BTRFS RAID1
install).
A) I start
On Feb 13, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Saint Germain saint...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 February 2014 09:50, Frank Kingswood
fr...@kingswood-consulting.co.uk wrote:
On 12/02/14 17:13, Saint Germain wrote:
Ok based on your advices, here is what I have done so far to use UEFI
(remeber that the objective
On 11 February 2014 19:15, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
To summarize, I think I have 3 options for partitioning (I am not
considering UEFI secure boot or swap):
1) grub, BTRFS partition (i.e. full disk in BTRFS), /boot inside BTRFS
subvolume
This doesn't seem like a good
On Feb 12, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Saint Germain saint...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 February 2014 19:15, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
To summarize, I think I have 3 options for partitioning (I am not
considering UEFI secure boot or swap):
1) grub, BTRFS partition (i.e. full disk in
Hello and thanks for your feedback !
Cc back to the mailing-list as it may be of interest here as well.
On 11 February 2014 16:11, Kyle Gates kylega...@hotmail.com wrote:
The big problem I currently have is that based on your input, I
hesitate a lot on my partitioning scheme: should I use a
On Feb 11, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Saint Germain saint...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello and thanks for your feedback !
Cc back to the mailing-list as it may be of interest here as well.
On 11 February 2014 16:11, Kyle Gates kylega...@hotmail.com wrote:
The big problem I currently have is that based
Chris Murphy posted on Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:15:56 -0700 as excerpted:
The distros should be pressured to move to grub 2.02, currently in beta,
upon release. And I think it would be good for Btrfs testers to build
grub 2.02 beta, and try to break it with various Btrfs configurations so
that it
13 matches
Mail list logo
