Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-28 Thread Stefan Malte Schumacher
So try this one: btrfs balance start -musage=0 -v I fear that didn't work too. mars:/mnt # btrfs balance start -musage=0 -v btrfs/ Dumping filters: flags 0x6, state 0x0, force is off METADATA (flags 0x2): balancing, usage=0 SYSTEM (flags 0x2): balancing, usage=0 Done, had to relocate

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-28 Thread Hugo Mills
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:57:02PM +0200, Stefan Malte Schumacher wrote: So try this one: btrfs balance start -musage=0 -v I fear that didn't work too. mars:/mnt # btrfs balance start -musage=0 -v btrfs/ Dumping filters: flags 0x6, state 0x0, force is off METADATA (flags 0x2):

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-28 Thread Dan van der Ster
Hi Stefan, On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: They're harmless -- it's a side-effect of the way that mkfs works. They'll go away if you balance them: btrfs balance start -dprofiles=single -mprofiles=single -sprofiles=single /mountpoint btrfs

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-27 Thread Stefan Malte Schumacher
Hello Chris and Duncan: I tried both your suggestions but unfortunately without success. Here is the output: mars:~ # btrfs balance start -susage=0 -f -v /mnt/btrfs/ Dumping filters: flags 0xa, state 0x0, force is on SYSTEM (flags 0x2): balancing, usage=0 Done, had to relocate 0 out of 2708

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-27 Thread Duncan
Stefan Malte Schumacher posted on Sun, 27 Apr 2014 17:37:26 +0200 as excerpted: Chris and Duncan: I tried both your suggestions but unfortunately without success. Here is the output: mars:~ # btrfs balance start -susage=0 -f -v /mnt/btrfs/ Dumping filters: flags 0xa, state 0x0, force is on

Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-26 Thread Stefan Malte Schumacher
Hello Yesterday I created a btrfs-filesystem on two disk, using raid1 for data and metadata. I then mounted it and rsynced several TB of data onto it. mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d raid1 /dev/sdf /dev/sdg The command btrfs fi df /mnt/btrfs result in the following output: Data, RAID1: total=2.64TiB,

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-26 Thread Hugo Mills
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 04:09:15PM +0200, Stefan Malte Schumacher wrote: Hello Yesterday I created a btrfs-filesystem on two disk, using raid1 for data and metadata. I then mounted it and rsynced several TB of data onto it. mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d raid1 /dev/sdf /dev/sdg The command

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-26 Thread Stefan Malte Schumacher
They're harmless -- it's a side-effect of the way that mkfs works. They'll go away if you balance them: btrfs balance start -dprofiles=single -mprofiles=single -sprofiles=single /mountpoint btrfs refused this command, I had to pass --force to execute it. It exited with this:Done,

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-26 Thread Chris Murphy
On Apr 26, 2014, at 12:18 PM, Stefan Malte Schumacher s.schumac...@netcologne.de wrote: They're harmless -- it's a side-effect of the way that mkfs works. They'll go away if you balance them: btrfs balance start -dprofiles=single -mprofiles=single -sprofiles=single /mountpoint

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-26 Thread Duncan
Chris Murphy posted on Sat, 26 Apr 2014 15:28:03 -0600 as excerpted: btrfs balance start -dprofiles=single -mprofiles=single -sprofiles=single /mountpoint After that btrfs fi df shows the following: Data, RAID1: total=2.64TiB, used=2.22TiB System, RAID1: total=8.00MiB, used=380.00KiB