On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:32:03AM -0500, Jim Salter wrote:
That is FANTASTIC news. Thank you for wielding the LART gently. =)
No LART necessary. :) Nobody knows everything, and it's not a
particularly heavily-documented or written-about feature at the moment
(mostly because it only exists
Hi Jim,
On 02/13/2014 05:13 PM, Jim Salter wrote:
This might be a stupid question but...
There is no stupid questions, only stupid answers...
Are there any plans to make parity RAID levels in btrfs similar to
the current implementation of btrfs-raid1?
It took me a while to realize how
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:22:07PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Jim,
On 02/13/2014 05:13 PM, Jim Salter wrote:
Let's say you have five disks, and you arbitrarily want to define a
stripe length of four data blocks plus one parity block per stripe.
I what it is different from a
This might be a stupid question but...
Are there any plans to make parity RAID levels in btrfs similar to the
current implementation of btrfs-raid1?
It took me a while to realize how different and powerful btrfs-raid1 is
from traditional raid1. The ability to string together virtually any
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:13:58AM -0500, Jim Salter wrote:
This might be a stupid question but...
Are there any plans to make parity RAID levels in btrfs similar to
the current implementation of btrfs-raid1?
Yes.
It took me a while to realize how different and powerful btrfs-raid1
is
That is FANTASTIC news. Thank you for wielding the LART gently. =)
I do a fair amount of public speaking and writing about next-gen
filesystems (example:
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/01/bitrot-and-atomic-cows-inside-next-gen-filesystems/)
and I will be VERY sure to talk
