Rich Freeman r-bt...@thefreemanclan.net schrieb:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Kai Krakow hurikha...@gmail.com wrote:
With the planned performance improvements, I'm guessing the best way will
become mounting the root subvolume (subvolid 0) and letting duperemove
work on that as a whole -
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Kai Krakow hurikha...@gmail.com wrote:
With the planned performance improvements, I'm guessing the best way will
become mounting the root subvolume (subvolid 0) and letting duperemove work
on that as a whole - including crossing all fs boundaries.
Why cross
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 13:43 +0200, Kai Krakow wrote:
Concluding that: duperemove should probably not try to become smart about
filesystem boundaries. It should either cross them or not as it is now - the
option is left to the user (as is the task to supply proper cmdline
arguments with
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 16:44 +0200, Kai Krakow wrote:
Yes, the chosen default is probably not the best for this kind of utility.
But I suppose it follows the principle of least surprise. At least every
utility I'm daily using (like find) follows this default route.
But the default with all
Rich Freeman r-bt...@thefreemanclan.net schrieb:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Martin m_bt...@ml1.co.uk wrote:
Anyone with any comments on how well duperemove performs for TB-sized
volumes?
Took many hours but less than a day for a few TB - I'm not sure
whether it is smart enough to
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:07:29AM +, Martin wrote:
Excellent and very rapid packaging, thanks!
Already compiled, installed, and soon to be tried on a test subvolume...
Anyone with any comments on how well duperemove performs for TB-sized
volumes?
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 09:30:52PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:10:46PM +, Martin wrote:
As titled:
Does btrfs have dedup (on raid1 multiple disks) that can be enabled?
The current
On 25/03/15 01:30, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:10:46PM +, Martin wrote:
As titled:
Does btrfs have dedup (on raid1 multiple disks) that can be enabled?
The current state of play is on the wiki:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Martin m_bt...@ml1.co.uk wrote:
Anyone with any comments on how well duperemove performs for TB-sized
volumes?
Took many hours but less than a day for a few TB - I'm not sure
whether it is smart enough to take less time on subsequent scans like
bedup.
Does
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:10:46PM +, Martin wrote:
As titled:
Does btrfs have dedup (on raid1 multiple disks) that can be enabled?
The current state of play is on the wiki:
As titled:
Does btrfs have dedup (on raid1 multiple disks) that can be enabled?
Can anyone relate any experiences?
Is there (or will there be,) a bad penalty of fragmentation?
(For kernel 3.18.9)
Thanks,
Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:10:46PM +, Martin wrote:
As titled:
Does btrfs have dedup (on raid1 multiple disks) that can be enabled?
The current state of play is on the wiki:
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Deduplication
Can anyone relate any experiences?
duperemove is
12 matches
Mail list logo
