Hi
I am just looking at the features enabled on my btrfs volume.
ls /sys/fs/btrfs/[UUID]/features/
shows the following output:
big_metadata compress_lzo extended_iref mixed_backref raid56
So big_metadata means I am not using skinny-metadata,
compress_lzo means I am using compression.
Thanks a lot for the explanation.
Regards,
Aastha.
On 3 December 2012 13:02, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 10:52:41AM +0100, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 2 December 2012 23:46, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:17:26PM +0100, Aastha
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 07:49:17PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 2, 2012, at 6:59 PM, Michael m...@draftx.net wrote:
Subvolid=0 is always the root subvolume.
OK so then what is subvolid=5?
subvolid=5 is the actual ID used internally for the top-level
subvolume. subvolid=0 won't
Hello,
Thank you so much for your prompt response. Few more questions inline.
On 2 December 2012 23:46, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:17:26PM +0100, Aastha Mehta wrote:
I am looking at btrfs to understand some of its features. One of them
is the snapshot
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 10:52:41AM +0100, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 2 December 2012 23:46, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:17:26PM +0100, Aastha Mehta wrote:
I am looking at btrfs to understand some of its features. One of them
is the snapshot feature. Please
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:17:26PM +0100, Aastha Mehta wrote:
I am looking at btrfs to understand some of its features. One of them
is the snapshot feature. Please tell me if my following understanding
about snapshots in btrfs is correct or not.
Btrfs supports both readonly and writeable
On Dec 2, 2012, at 3:46 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
No, there's precisely one top-level subvolume (subvolid=5).
What is subvolid=0? I recently got myself into a subvolume maze and ended up
mounting subvolid=0 to get back to the top level and that seemed to work at the
time.
Subvolid 0 is always the root.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Michael m...@draftx.net wrote:
Subvolid=0 is always the root subvolume.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Dec 2, 2012, at 3:46 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
No, there's
On Dec 2, 2012, at 6:59 PM, Michael m...@draftx.net wrote:
Subvolid=0 is always the root subvolume.
OK so then what is subvolid=5?
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 07:49:17PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 2, 2012, at 6:59 PM, Michael m...@draftx.net wrote:
Subvolid=0 is always the root subvolume.
OK so then what is subvolid=5?
We've parsed subvolid=5 and subvolid=0 to the same results, FS_TREE.
FYI, the code is
Hi all
With Sun^WOracle's changes to the Solaris license and more, Btrfs looks more
welcome every day. However, I can't find anything about its progress for
stabilisation or features, so I guess it miht be appropriate to ask here?
* How far is Btrfs to become stable as in for production use?
*
11 matches
Mail list logo
