On 2017-11-06 13:35, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:51 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
wrote:
This brings to mind another 'feature' of BTRFS that I came across recently,
namely that subvolumes that aren't explicitly mounted still show up as mount
points according
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:51 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> This brings to mind another 'feature' of BTRFS that I came across recently,
> namely that subvolumes that aren't explicitly mounted still show up as mount
> points according to how most CLI tools differentiate
On 2017-11-05 03:01, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
04.11.2017 21:55, Chris Murphy пишет:
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
04.11.2017 10:05, Adam Borowski пишет:
On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 09:26:36AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
04.11.2017 07:49, Adam
04.11.2017 21:55, Chris Murphy пишет:
> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> 04.11.2017 10:05, Adam Borowski пишет:
>>> On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 09:26:36AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
04.11.2017 07:49, Adam Borowski пишет:
> On Fri, Nov 03,
On 4 November 2017 at 14:55, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> 04.11.2017 10:05, Adam Borowski пишет:
>>> On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 09:26:36AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
04.11.2017 07:49, Adam
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 04.11.2017 10:05, Adam Borowski пишет:
>> On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 09:26:36AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>>> 04.11.2017 07:49, Adam Borowski пишет:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:15:53PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
04.11.2017 10:05, Adam Borowski пишет:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 09:26:36AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> 04.11.2017 07:49, Adam Borowski пишет:
>>> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:15:53PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
Ancient bug, still seems to be a bug.
On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 09:26:36AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 04.11.2017 07:49, Adam Borowski пишет:
> > On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:15:53PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> Ancient bug, still seems to be a bug.
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906591
> >>
> >> The issue is
04.11.2017 07:49, Adam Borowski пишет:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:15:53PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Ancient bug, still seems to be a bug.
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906591
>>
>> The issue is that updatedb by default will not index bind mounts, but
>> by default on Fedora
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:15:53PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Ancient bug, still seems to be a bug.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906591
>
> The issue is that updatedb by default will not index bind mounts, but
> by default on Fedora and probably other distros, put /home on a
>
Ancient bug, still seems to be a bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906591
The issue is that updatedb by default will not index bind mounts, but
by default on Fedora and probably other distros, put /home on a
subvolume and then mount that subvolume which is in effect a bind
mount.
11 matches
Mail list logo