Eugene Crosser posted on Sat, 02 Jul 2016 12:49:53 +0300 as excerpted:
> Enter the second system. It is a rented physical server in a datacenter
> with two hard disks, joined into a single root btrfs (/dev/sd[ab]1 are
> swap partitions):
>
> root@dehost:~# uname -a
> Linux dehost
Hi Duncan,
I pretty much understand the risks and do not need them to be explained to me.
When I installed the remote system, the versions where pretty close to the
cutting edge. And the problem looks as if it *could* to be the same in 3.13 and
in 4.4 kernels.
I wrote here to ask advice about
On 06/13/2016 02:33 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2016-06-10 18:39, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
On 06/11/2016 12:10 AM, ojab // wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Hans van Kranenburg
wrote:
You can work around it by either adding two disks (like Henk
Hello,
This may be the same problem as "btrfs lockup".
I have two systems using btrfs for several years. One is my home desktop, it has
root+home ext4 fs on a PCI SSD, and "big stuff" on a btrfs using two hard disks
in RAID1 configuration:
root@pccross:/export# uname -a
Linux pccross
There are optimizations in archivers (tar, rsync, ...) that rely on up2date
st_blocks info. For example, in GNU tar there is optimization check [1]
whether the 'st_size' reports more data than the 'st_blocks' can hold --> then
tar considers that file is sparse (and does additional steps).
It
I just rebooted a VM into a 4.7 kernel. The joy didn't last long. After
177 seconds the btrfs data partition (root is on ext4) locked up. Worse,
it keeps locking up on any action performed even when rebooting it with
older kernels again. D: The filesystem initially mounts fine, but then
locks
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Grey Christoforo wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> This is interesting:
>>
>> Jul 01 11:56:40 kernel: BTRFS info (device nvme0n1p5): relocating
>> block group 232511242240 flags 1
>>
>>
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Hans van Kranenburg
wrote:
> On 07/02/2016 07:14 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
>>
>> I just rebooted a VM into a 4.7 kernel. The joy didn't last long. After
>> 177 seconds the btrfs data partition (root is on ext4) locked up.
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Hans van Kranenburg
wrote:
>
> Also, the behaviour of *always* creating a new empty block group before
> starting to work (which makes it impossible to free up space on a fully
> allocated filesystem with balance) got reverted in:
>
On 07/02/2016 09:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Hans van Kranenburg
wrote:
On 07/02/2016 07:14 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
I just rebooted a VM into a 4.7 kernel. The joy didn't last long. After
177 seconds the btrfs data
On 07/02/2016 07:14 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
I just rebooted a VM into a 4.7 kernel. The joy didn't last long. After
177 seconds the btrfs data partition (root is on ext4) locked up. Worse,
it keeps locking up on any action performed even when rebooting it with
older kernels again. D: The
Hi,
My setup is that I use one file system for / and /home (on SSD) and a
larger raid 10 for /mnt/share (6 x 2TB).
Today I've discovered that 14 of files that are supposed to be over
2GB are in fact just 4096 bytes. I've checked the content of those 4KB
and it seems that it does contain
On 07/02/2016 09:40 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
On 07/02/2016 09:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Hans van Kranenburg
wrote:
On 07/02/2016 07:14 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
I just rebooted a VM into a 4.7 kernel. The joy
size contains the value returned by posix_acl_from_xattr(), which
returns -ERANGE, -ENODATA, zero, or an integer greater than zero. So
replace -ENOENT by -ERANGE.
Signed-off-by: Salah Triki
---
fs/btrfs/acl.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
On Friday, July 01, 2016 04:25:52 PM Josef Bacik wrote:
> On 07/01/2016 12:11 PM, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> > Sorry, Forgot to add the mailing list to CC. Doing it now ...
> >
> >> While running btrfs/113, I see the following call trace,
> >>
> >> [ 182.272009] BTRFS: assertion failed:
15 matches
Mail list logo