Hi.
I think you need to add the power_wait"10" & lanplus="1"
Try this line:
fencedevice agent="fence_ipmilan" power_wait="10" ipaddr="xx.xx.xx.xx"
lanplus="1" login="xxxt" name="node1_ilo" passwd="yyy
Regards
Shalom.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Parvez Shaikh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am o
-H 'xxx' -U 'admin' -P 'xx1!'
> -v chassis power cycle'...
> Failed
>
> cluster.conf
>
>
> name="xx_dev" timeout="20"/>
> ..
>
>
Hi.
for ilo3 testing you can use :
# fence_ipmilan -a 17x.3x.7x.1xx -p "password" -o status
fence_ipmilan -h
usage: fence_ipmilan
-A IPMI Lan Auth type (md5, password, or none)
-a IPMI Lan IP to talk to
-i IPMI Lan IP to talk to (deprecated, use -a)
-p Password (if requir
Hello.
I think its not supported yet.
You should use ifence_ipmilan.
Regards
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Mika i wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there a way to get cluster-suite Fence to work with Rhel 5.5 and iLo3
> I have now in both clusters rhel 5.5 version with:
> kernel 2.6.18-194.el5
> cman-2.0.
emove active clustered logical volume domlv? [y/n]:
> y
> Error locking on node node1.domtest.com: LV domvg/domlv in use: not
> deactivating
> Unable to deactivate logical volume "domlv"
>
> - dominic
>
> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:07 PM, שלום קלמר wrote:
>
>>
eb 5, 2011 at 12:07 AM, שלום קלמר wrote:
> Hello Dominic.
>
> I will be in lab on monday and collect all steps & logs files.
>
> btw - Is it redhat recommendation to preferre using HA-LVM with the
> locking_type=1 method ??
>
>
> Regards
>
> Shalom
>
cluster.conf
> * attach cluster.conf and /var/log/messages.
>
> dominic
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 8:34 PM, שלום קלמר wrote:
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> This is the old methos and its work great but its hard to maintain such
>> cluster.
>>
>> Shalom.
>
>> Excellent,
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -C
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:38 AM, שלום קלמר wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:35 PM, שלום קלמר wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
Hi.
Can you please attach the cluster.conf file ?
Shalom.
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:14 PM, punit_j wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I am using Redhat cluster suite for HA for my services. I have a 3+ 1 node
> cluster with 1 vote each for a node and also a Quoram disk with votes=3. So
> the total expected_votes
rather be using clvmd if it is the way to go. Can you point
> me to the docs you are seeing these instructions in please?
>
> As for why your config isn't working, clvmd requires that it's
> resources are indeed tagged as cluster volumes, so you might try doing
> that and see
Hello.
I followed redhat instruction trying install HA-LVM with clvmd. ( rhcs 5.6 -
rgmanager 2.0.52-9 )
I can't make it work.
lvm.conf- locking_type=3
clvmd work
Its failed saying HA-LVM is not configured correctly.
The manual said that we should run "lvchange -a n lvxx" edit the
clust
Hi.
for forgot to assign the fence devices to clusternodes.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Goutam Baul wrote:
> Dear List Members,
>
>
>
> We are trying to create a two-node
Hi.
I think that if you want to overwrite the shells interval you need to add
"depth":
Customizing Actions with Multiple Depths
Some agents implement multiple monitoring or status depths with different
timeouts in order to perform different levels of checking. For example, a
'0' depth for the s
Hi.
look at /usr/share/cluster/script.sh
each resource got his own status interval check.
Shalom.
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:07 PM, carlopmart wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have configured some cluster resources assigning a custom time for
> action status, but doesn't works. For example:
>
> recov
Hi.
I never tried that but mybe this article can help you:
How do I create a clustered virtual service for my Xen guest using
system-config-cluster? Article ID: 5911 - Created on: Oct 28, 2007 7:00 PM -
Last Modified: Oct 28, 2007 7:00 PM
The virtual service component of Red Hat Cluster Suite a
The heartbeat is defined in your cluster.conf file.
you can not define more than one network.
what you can do is to set your private network as heartbeat & define public
ip resource.
be aware that after changes you can still reach the fence devices.
Shalom.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:50 PM, mogr
Hi.
I know it. I meant using it as filesystem resourse as "reguler" or under "HALVM"
Shalom.
On 3/10/10, Jakov Sosic wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 09:02 PM, שלום קלמר wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Does someone know if Redhat support using shared ext4 filesystem in
Thanks!
On 3/9/10, "Thomas L. Sjølshagen" wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:02 PM, שלום קלמר wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > Does someone know if Redhat support using shared ext4 filesystem in RHCS
> > ??
> >
> > ( redhat 5.4 )
> >
>
>
Hi.
Does someone know if Redhat support using shared ext4 filesystem in RHCS ??
( redhat 5.4 )
Regards.
Shalom.
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
Hi.
try add lvm to this volume.
I think that the locking is working on lvs & not on the VGs. After creating
the lvs, I think
you should see both vgs & lvs.
Shalom.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Michael wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your reply. pvscan finds the new created pv but vgscan can'
Hi.
are you sure that in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf locking_type=3 on node 2 ??
do you see the disk on node 2 ( sfdisk -l ) ??
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:49 PM, brem belguebli wrote:
> have you tried to pvscan/vgscan on node2 after creation on node1 ?
>
>
> 2010/3/8 Michael :
> > no suggestion?
> >
> > T
Hi.
you got some errors on your cluster.conf file.
1. you must check that fence_rsa works berfore starting the cluster.
2. if you are using quorumd, change cman to :
3. put quorumd votes=1 , min_score=1
4. change your heuristic program to somthing like ping to your router.( its
better to add m
achine.
> >
> > VMS and Tru64 use the panic method but the other nodes will issue a
> > reservation on the scsi bus against that node to protect the storage.
> They
> > can do that because they know exactly how there hardware and
> implementation
> > of reservations
Thanks to all
shalom.kle...@hp.com
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Lon Hohberger wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 13:10 +0200, שלום קלמר wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I got 2 power supplies. But if someone by mistake pull the power
> > cables , is that mean
> &g
Hi.
I got 2 power supplies. But if someone by mistake pull the power cables , is
that mean
That the services will not failover ??
Regards
Shalom.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Georgi Stanojevski wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:17 PM, שלום קלמר wrote:
>
>>
>> T
Hi.
I am runnig fence_ipmilan on iDRAC6.
Regards
Shalom
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan <
raju.rajs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:40 PM, שלום קלמר wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Everything is working fine
Hello.
I build 2 members redhat 5.3 cluster with latest cman rpm.
Everything is working fine. We did some failover tests, all tests passed (
nic , fiber , reboot ).
The only test which failed was - pulling out power cable from one node.
The other system try in loop fencing the failed node & ser
Hello.
I build 2 members cluster with qdisk.
I define 3 heuristic which each got score=1 .
1 to public network router & 2 to cross interconnect.
Its seems that only the public heuristic works.
Q1:
1. When i test the cross interconnect , nothing happen.
2. When i test the public heuristic i got
Hello
Hello !!!
I build Redhat cluster suite 5.3 with latest cman,openais,rgmanager rpms.
The hardware is dell r610 with fence_drac5 .
Lvm is configured as HA-LVM.
The cluster is working properly , but customer asked for some features which
i
Hope someone can help me
29 matches
Mail list logo
