least
try it first...
On 03/15/2011 02:26 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
Jack Duston wrote:
Thanks Yue, but your information would seem dated if this site is correct:
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/compare
Even if 100TB is what's officially supported in RHEL6, it doesn't mean
that larger file sy
3/15/2011 03:09 AM, Ryan Mitchell wrote:
On 03/15/2011 08:35 AM, Jack Duston wrote:
I planned to free up enough space on the GFS2 LV to migrate data off
one LUN. I could then decrease the GFS2 file system size, remove the
LUN from the LV, destroy the RAID LUN, replace 1TB HDDs with 3TB HDDs,
rebui
ze of a GFS2 file system is 25 TB. If your system requires
> GFS2 file systems larger than 25 TB, contact your Red Hat service
> representative.
>
>
> At 2011-03-15 06:35:30，"Jack Duston" wrote:
>
> >Hello folks,
> >
> >I am planning to create a 2 node clust
Hello folks,
I am planning to create a 2 node cluster with a GFS2 CLVM SAN.
The following Note in the RHEL6 GFS2 manual jumped out at me:
Chapter 3. Managing GFS2
Note:
Once you have created a GFS2 file system with the mkfs.gfs2 command, you
cannot decrease the size of the file system. You can,
