We have ISCSI based storage and are using GFS during a demo period, but
I don't think we can afford it after the demo period is over.
The fencing is another issue for us. I need to learn more about that.
I'm not sure I'm fully grasping all I need to there. I'm still trying
to get nfs file s
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:37:11AM -0400, Lon Hohberger wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:39:05PM -0400, Randy Brown wrote:
> > Right. That's the way I understood it to be. Using ext3 would require
> > us to have to umount and remount the file systems to the each host after
> > the failure, t
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:39:05PM -0400, Randy Brown wrote:
> Right. That's the way I understood it to be. Using ext3 would require
> us to have to umount and remount the file systems to the each host after
> the failure, though, correct? In other words, would require
> administrator interac
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:39:28AM -0400, Rob Kenna wrote:
> Referring to http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/advanced/, RHEL 5
> Advanced Platform does indeed include GFS and RHCS (Cluster Suite.) This
> is exclusive to RHEL 5, so you can not buy an RHEL 5 Advanced Platform
> subscription and ru
D] On Behalf Of Rob Kenna
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 9:39 AM
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Please correct me if I'm wrong, but... -
RHEL5 Advanced Platform DOES include Clustering & GFS...
Hi Folks -
Referring to http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/advanced/, RHEL 5
Adv
-cluster] Please correct me if I'm wrong, but...
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:12:55PM -0500, Kevin Anderson wrote:
The cluster and gfs components are actually part of the RHEL5 Advanced
Platform product grouping, so if you purchase a subscription to that,
you get the cluster components, gf
Randy Brown wrote:
> in order to configure a two-node high availability NFS failover cluster,
> I need to use GFS, correct?
No. Both options accomplish the same objective: sharing an storage space
and providing seamless services to your users. I'll try and explain my
experience with GFS vs. NFS, a
Yes. In the US RHEL 5 AP Includes GFS / Cluster.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jos Vos
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 4:18 PM
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Please correct me if I'm wrong, but...
On Mon, Aug 20,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:12:55PM -0500, Kevin Anderson wrote:
> The cluster and gfs components are actually part of the RHEL5 Advanced
> Platform product grouping, so if you purchase a subscription to that,
> you get the cluster components, gfs and virtualization.
Does that actually work that w
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 16:54 -0400, Michael Patrimonio wrote:
> Randy,
>
> I don't know what to say about the information you're getting, but I just
> logged in to a Red Hat Network account to verify. The Cluster Suite offering
> was repackaged with RHEL5, and it now has three major components (
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 05:02:31PM -0400, Randy Brown wrote:
> h.. OK. So it looks like we can do what we want to do with or
> without GFS, and it looks like I was also misinformed about the
> cost/availability. Interesting. I guess I know what I'll be doing over
> the next couple of day
m between nodes.
=
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Randy Brown
Sent: Mon 8/20/2007 16:39
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Please correct me if I'm wrong, but...
Right. That's the way I understood it to be. Using ext3 would require us to
have to umount and remount the
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:54:38PM -0400, Michael Patrimonio wrote:
> I don't know what to say about the information you're getting, but I
> just logged in to a Red Hat Network account to verify. The Cluster Suite
> offering was repackaged with RHEL5, and it now has three major components
> (on Di
clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Please correct me if I'm wrong, but...
Right. That's the way I understood it to be. Using ext3 would require us to
have to umount and remount the file systems to the each host after the failure,
though, correct? In other words, would require adm
er Storage (which includes GFS and
lvm2-cluster) and Virtualization.
Regards,
Michael
=
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Randy Brown
Sent: Mon 8/20/2007 16:25
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Please correct me if I'm wrong, but...
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:39:05PM -0400, Randy Brown wrote:
> Right. That's the way I understood it to be. Using ext3 would require
> us to have to umount and remount the file systems to the each host after
> the failure, though, correct? In other words, would require
> administrator intera
Right. That's the way I understood it to be. Using ext3 would require
us to have to umount and remount the file systems to the each host after
the failure, though, correct? In other words, would require
administrator interaction. GFS would do this automatically without
impacting the users.
s was dropped with RHEL4 Update 4 and not restored with Update 5. This would have made this build of this configuration so much easier. Oh well.
=
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Randy Brown
Sent: Mon 8/20/2007 15:26
To: linux clustering
Subject: [Linux-clus
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 03:26:08PM -0400, Randy Brown wrote:
> in order to configure a two-node high availability NFS failover cluster,
> I need to use GFS, correct?
You can use EXT3; you just can only mount the file system on one
node at a time.
With GFS, you can export the same file system fr
ild of this configuration
so much easier. Oh well.
=
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Randy Brown
Sent: Mon 8/20/2007 15:26
To: linux clustering
Subject: [Linux-cluster] Please correct me if I'm wrong, but...
in order to configure a two-node hi
in order to configure a two-node high availability NFS failover cluster,
I need to use GFS, correct?
I am wanting to configure two machines in a cluster and use them as a
NAS head for an ISCSI based storage unit providing NFS file systems to
the machines on our network. I'd like to have the
21 matches
Mail list logo
