Re: [Linux-cluster] Trying to locate the bottleneck

2009-07-08 Thread Raymond Setchfield
ux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Raymond Setchfield Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 11:13 AM To: linux clustering Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Trying to locate the bottleneck Hi Guys I am trying to locate ip_conntrack_max within CentOS 5.3 but it doesn't appear to be

RE: [Linux-cluster] Trying to locate the bottleneck

2009-07-08 Thread Jeff Sturm
to:linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com] > On Behalf Of Raymond Setchfield > Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 11:13 AM > To: linux clustering > Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Trying to locate the bottleneck > > Hi Guys > > I am trying to locate ip_conntrack_max within CentOS 5

Re: [Linux-cluster] Trying to locate the bottleneck

2009-07-08 Thread Raymond Setchfield
Hi Guys I am trying to locate ip_conntrack_max within CentOS 5.3 but it doesn't appear to be where I expect it to be. I have googled for this and from what I have read it should be located within /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max Which is where I thought it would be but unfortunately it is

Re: [Linux-cluster] Trying to locate the bottleneck

2009-07-08 Thread Raymond Setchfield
Hi Jeff Many Thanks for your reply. I have had a look to see if there if there is anything suspicious within dmesg and within messages and unfortunately there isn't anything at all apart from one timeout. Jul 8 10:15:51 loadbalancer-01 nanny[5427]: [inactive] shutting down 192.168.10.36:80

RE: [Linux-cluster] Trying to locate the bottleneck

2009-07-07 Thread Jeff Sturm
Hi Raymond, At those concurrency levels I would suspect network tuning may help. Does dmesg show anything interesting on the load balancers during your testing? For high levels of concurrency on a NAT'd firewall or load balancer I specifically remember having to adjust ip_conntrack_max upwards. P