Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workqueue ?

2007-08-27 Thread Eran Ben-Avi
Hi, I tested IPSec(tunnel mode) routing performance between 2 GbE ports using packet generator(SMARTBIT) on ARM 500MHz with latest OCF patched on Openswan2.4.9 and I noticed the callback functions are using workqueue. Since RX was performed in NAPI mode with higher priority then TX (in workque

Re: Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workqueue ?

2007-08-27 Thread David McCullough
Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ... > Hi, > > I tested IPSec(tunnel mode) routing performance between 2 GbE ports using > packet generator(SMARTBIT) on ARM 500MHz with latest OCF patched on > Openswan2.4.9 and I noticed the callback functions are using workqueue. > Since RX was performed in

Re: Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workqueue ?

2007-08-30 Thread Eran Ben-Avi
--- David McCullough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ... > > Hi, > > > > I tested IPSec(tunnel mode) routing performance > between 2 GbE ports using packet generator(SMARTBIT) > on ARM 500MHz with latest OCF patched on > Openswan2.4.9 and I noticed the call

Re: Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workqueue ?

2007-08-30 Thread David McCullough
Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ... > > --- David McCullough > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ... > > > Hi, > > > > > > I tested IPSec(tunnel mode) routing performance > > between 2 GbE ports using packet generator(SMARTBIT) > > on ARM 500MHz wi

RE: Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workqueue ?

2007-09-11 Thread Kabir Ahsan-r9aahw
: Re: Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workqueue ? --- David McCullough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ... > > Hi, > > > > I tested IPSec(tunnel mode) routing performance > between 2 GbE ports using packet generator(SMAR

Re: Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workqueue ?

2007-09-12 Thread David McCullough
ng on there, Cheers, Davidm > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eran Ben-Avi > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:58 AM > To: David McCullough > Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or

Re: Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workqueue ?

2007-09-26 Thread David McCullough
Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ... > > Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ... > > > Hi, > > > > > > I tested IPSec(tunnel mode) routing performance > > between 2 GbE ports using packet generator(SMARTBIT) > > on ARM 500MHz with latest OCF patched on > > Openswan2.4.9 and I noticed the callback fun

Re: Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workqueue ?

2007-11-01 Thread Eran Ben-Avi
- Original Message > From: David McCullough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Eran Ben-Avi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 12:26:10 PM > Subject: Re: Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workque

Re: Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workqueue ?

2007-11-04 Thread David McCullough
Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ... ... > > I have made a few small changes to your patch so it should be safe on > > 2.4 systems yet still select tasklets on 2.6 automatically. > > > > Could you have a look at it ? I have done some basic testing here > > and it seems ok, haven't checked your p

OCF for Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workqueue ?

2007-08-27 Thread Eran Ben-Avi
Hi, I tested IPSec(tunnel mode) routing performance between 2 GbE ports using packet generator(SMARTBIT) on ARM 500MHz with latest OCF patched on Openswan2.4.9 and I noticed the callback functions are using workqueue. Since RX was performed in NAPI mode with higher priority then TX (in workque