On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:50:27 +0200, Carsten Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Irek Defee wrote:
> > I can only confirm that in version 2.4 there is no problem whatsoever,
> > I am running machines with 6 cards installed since I have that many PCI
> > slots available and all is fine and stable. Ano
On Fri, 7 May 2004 16:56:53 +0200 (MEST), Udo Wolter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd stand a lot if it just costs only 5% performance
> but I want to stay in hyperthreading. Switching off hyperthreading costs
> 30-40% performance. :(
I have run a 4 card VDR system and NFS server for 2 VDR client
On Sun, 2 May 2004 23:18:05 +0200 (MEST), Udo Wolter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 16:1533283 20198587 IO-APIC-level saa7146 (0)
...
> Any help for me ? Do I have to give more informations ?
Try to move the interrupt to 9 or 10 to get edge triggered interrupts,
may be this helps.
Emil
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:22:24 +1000, Michal Dobrzynski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apart from the 75 Ohm resistor I don't even know what the rest of the
> circuitry is for. With just the resistors the signal is terminated and
> the TV doesn't have the R, G or B values overdriven.
>
> Please e
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:34:42 +1000, Michal Dobrzynski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In an email sent to me rather than the list you mentioned the
> following. I hope you don't mind me forwarding this part to the list as
> I wanted further opinions.
No, it is just the brain-dead setting of this m
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:05:30 +1000, Michal Dobrzynski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PLEASE explain to me what I am doing wrong and how to avoid this
> ghosting. Preferably without needing to spend another 40 hours
> soldering. And if you know of any PRACTICAL advice on how to solder for
> a begi
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:05:32 +0100 (MET), "Johann Hanne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I should have checked this earlier...: If i use TWO processes (the first one
> reading from 3 boards, the second one reading from the 4th), i get data from
> all 4 boards.
>
> I.e. only if all 4 boards (demux an
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 19:43:21 +0100, Johann Hanne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm reading the entire transport stream from every card by using the dummy PID
> 8192 on the demux device and I use poll() calls to check if data is ready on
> some dvr device. But after opening the fourth device, no mo
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:49:36 +1000, Michal Dobrzynski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NOTE: Last time I sent this it never made it onto the list for some
> reason so I'm sending it again.
>
> Now that I've come up with a temporary solution to my TV-out problem
> I've moved onto tuning. I haven't b
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 10:21:43 +1000, Michal Dobrzynski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've found some info at
> http://www.vdrportal.de/board/portal_vdrinfo.php?
> site=7&infonr=4&infoln=en&sid=2e010195ed29a33af8a7f3d506ae42c0 but
> cannot decipher it.
This is the same as I have proposed, termi
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 07:58:55 +1000, Michal Dobrzynski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a 75Ohm resistor on the ground? Are you sure you don't mean on the
> composite video/luminance signal? I am electrically ignorant so it
> doesn't make much sense to me to put it on ground.
I mean between red and
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:18:12 +1000, Michal Dobrzynski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I couldn't help myself and I just tried it. It works :) Thanks.
>
> But I'm a bit concerned. Something doesn't seem quite right about the
> output. It's grainier than I think it should be and this is even
> visib
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 10:52:27 +0200, Javier Marcet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It must be consequence of some of the other changes committed these days,
> since channel switching, whether on the same or on different
> transponders is appreciably faster now.
I think it is the change in dvb_frontend
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 01:15:00 +0100, Ralph Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Do the oopses only occur with a xx01 as type
> in the gpioirq?
No, this was just my test case. I have done 6 concurrent recordings on 3
DVB cards. Here is another sample during regular use:
Feb 16 13:23:29 vdrpc k
Hi Ralph,
here we are. I now call the interrupt functions directly.
The first column identifies the trace point:
00: av7110_irq()
2nd column: av7110 pointer
3rd column: isr
0x0008 debi interrupt
0x0008 gpio interrupt
01: gpioirq()
2nd column: av7110 pointer
3rd co
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 20:27:50 +0100, Ralph Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> OK, it would be interesting to know from which point on e.g. in the
> debiirq() a gpioirq() can occur and also which new type (not the old
> debitype) this gpioirq() has.
I will try this tomorrow morning. Currently are
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 20:00:07 +0100, Ralph Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yes, but they should not happen in the first place.
> We will need some more detailed debugging info to find the position
> when e.g. the gpioirq() interrupts the debi processing.
> It should not be able to happen befor
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 14:36:56 +0100, Ralph Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Finally, what exactly is the problem you are having with the
> combined GPIO/DEBI IRQs?
> When do problems occur and with which firmware/driver?
>
> Maybe something went wrong when moving to tasklets, which I (for
> g
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:54:20 +0100, Oliver Endriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Because DPRAM is a very limited ressource, it would be great to
> resize the upload/download buffers dynamically.
> This way throughput could be optimized.
Why not use the buffers as shared resource with a minimum res
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:41:21 +0100, Johannes Stezenbach
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:43:04PM +0100, Emil Naepflein wrote:
> > Did you have a look at the traces I posted some days ago regarding the
> > GPIO0 oops?
>
> Yes, briefly. But I
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 16:31:37 +0100, Johannes Stezenbach
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 04:09:08PM +0100, Daniel Schneider wrote:
> > How stable is this DVB driver version with VDR 1.1.24? Are there
> > still OSD errors (missing text lines in menus) and does the ARM still
>
Hi,
I have build a trace which shows the sequence of interrupts. Here are a
few samples. I deleted the lines related to other controllers.
The first column identifies the trace point:
00: av7110_irq()
2nd column: av7110 pointer
3rd column: isr
0x0008 gpio interrupt
0x0
Hi,
since I have installed a new disk controller I sometimes see messages
like the following:
Feb 9 13:11:20 vdrpc kernel: GPIO0 irq oops
Feb 9 13:11:20 vdrpc kernel: DEBI irq oops
Sometimes even a arm crash follows. I have tried with different drivers
and played around with interrupt assignme
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002 19:10:59 +, "Daniel Schmelzer"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't know that there is open source bridge code for the SAA7146 Bt.656
> interface. There's plenty of open source code for the Conexant Fusion 878A
> and CX2388x chips, at least for Windows. That's what we use
On 30 Dec 2002 18:57:34 +, Justin Cormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 19:48, Emil Naepflein wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > has someone already thought about adding a SDI video interface to the
> > DVB-S card?
> >
> > The AV71
Hi,
has someone already thought about adding a SDI video interface to the
DVB-S card?
The AV7111 has a digital video output port (YCOUT8bit, YCCLK) which
outputs 8 bit 4:2:2 data with a 27 MHz clock.
Is this port normally activated in the firmware?
The spec also says that if the 32-bit EBI is u
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:48:39 +0100, Alexandre CONRAD
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you get the idea ? And if you have any ideas, your suggestions are open.
The problem is that you probably will not get always exact the same
frame content. There is a lot that can go wrong from retrieving it from
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 17:56:58 +0100, Alexandre CONRAD
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess having a "tolerance" on the image should do. But of course, that
> makes it more sophisticated.
How much do you know about image recognition?
What you want is possible, but it needs a lot of processing pow
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:22:12 +0100, "Stuart L. Morris"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does enough information exist in the public domain for someone (given
> enough time ;-) to decrypt B-Sky-B's VideoGuard encryption? I'm not
> talking about getting around the encryption but totally legal Sky
>
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:55:24 +0200, Axel Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >vdr can do this on pentium 100MHz systems with drives mounted via NFS...
> > all the work is done by the dvb card, and the data stream is only few
> > MB/s...
> No not in all cases - here a 800MHZ is nearly enough for a
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002 02:23:20 -0800, "Aurelian Pop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Any one of the driver developpers might know the problem?
> Could it be the fact that I changed that define in dvb.h?
I tried to use 5 dvb cards several month ago and have given up because
of interrupt problems. But I
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002 15:52:37 GMT, "Alessio Sangalli"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and if I have an official subscription to 2 irdeto providers, why can't I
> record from them the same time?
You can, with two CAMS and the official cards. I am not denying it.
Read the subject again. We talk abou
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002 08:46:32 +0100, Daniel Schneider
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybee soon, when Third Reich censorship is introduced again to
> protect the industry, their patents and their monopolies.
Gassners Law - You loose.
I hope for you that never the fruits of your hard work with wh
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 23:21:54 GMT, "Alessio Sangalli"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Emil Naepflein writes:
>
>
> > I fully agree with you here. The use of such a software is certainly not
> > legal and is unethical.
>
> certainly not? even if you pu
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 22:23:45 +0100, "Ulrich Petri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok i agree with you that integrating such a feature into vdr/dvb driver
> ist not such a good idea, but perhaps the way it was done on win can be
> gone here too (i'm talking of some kind of "plugin")...
Then do this
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 20:44:56 +0100, "Reiner Rosin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> So I really would appreciate, if discussions about such a piece of software
> will stop on this list. I know that nobody can be forced to do so...
I fully agree with you here. The use of such a software is certainly
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 16:05:05 +0100, "Engelmann F." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> i just installed DVB and VDR 0.99 on my Debian Woody System. Works Great!!!
> I think i will sell my MM9800s, but till now the contrast of my DVB card
> (Hauppauge DVB-s 1.3) is VERY poor!! The colores are also not th
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:16:27 +0100, Mirko Morschheuser
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anybody know if the DVB stream contains the same flags as in the Mpeg2
> stream on a DVD? Software Mpeg2 decoders usually read these flags and
> deinterlace according to them. Therefore you get problems when
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:17:01 +0100 (CET), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Emil Naepflein writes:
> > Does the MPEG stream transmitted bei DVB contain the interlace flag
> > identifying fields that belong together just like on DVD?
>
> Probably depends on the encoder
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:23:31 +0100 (CET), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think people are not aware that the DVB-s card also has a
> video4linux device that can give you the decoded video output via DMA.
> You can scale the picture, change the brightness etc. .
> How do you think xawtv displays t
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:11:41 +0100, Patrick GUENEAU
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure whether MPlayer is doing 3:2 Pulldown, but that's not a
> problem for us as we all live with PAL.
We need proper 2:2 pulldown to avoid the zick-zack lines.
Emil
--
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 10:54:00 +0100, Jonas Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my box is really stuffed with lots of peripherals.now my problem is that my
> dvb card shared it's irq with one of my nics and it seems that was the reason
> why my system keeped hanging. are there chances that i can p
On Thu, 06 Sep 2001 20:01:26 +0200, "Reiner Rosin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree with Klaus on this whole Name-thing, leave it as it is ;)...
> ... ok the handy-style makes some sense, but this matrix
> And even with T9??? I hope you made a joke ;) ... you would
> even need a
On Thu, 06 Sep 2001 18:11:55 +0200, Carsten Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> As you can see, it supports the required vdr buttons
> "Up", "Down", "Ok", "Left", "Right", "Red", "Green",
> "Yellow", "Blue", "0"-"9", "Power" directly and
> nicely. It has 8 additional buttons. Two of them
> would h
On Fri, 07 Sep 2001 06:35:02 +0200, Emil Naepflein
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I am missing most of the time is a fast way to display the channel
> menu to select a channel. The Humax 5400 displays it when pressing the
> OK button in TV mode. As VDR doesn't use the OK
On 06 Sep 2001 17:57:00 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rainer
Zocholl) wrote:
> Or the "back" key pressed 5 times(or so did not count how
> deep VDR's menu struture is)
> leds always to the top "menu": The normal TV screen.
Today you can press the menu button twice to go into the top menu. I
think t
> Since some day´s i use a full automatic script for TVTV.DE
> - so i can programm both Machines over the WEB.
This is certainly no option for me.
> Additional i can programm the "MAIN" VDR over the Remote-Controll.
> Please standby - currently Carsten and myself test this new
> solution and
On Sat, 1 Jan 2000 00:31:38 +0100, Axel Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Here i can have 3 Recordings (with 3 DVB-CARDS) and 2 Playback´s
> (2 clients with 1 DVB-CARD in each) - without any Problems !
How looks your solution for programming the timers?
Are you programming them on your record
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 20:30:00 +0200, Arno Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> since a few days I'm the proud owner of 2 DVB cards. One of the biggest
> advantages of this configuration for me is the possibility to perform
> timeshift. If I set up a timer, then the second card is used to record
>
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:45:30 +0200, "Gerhard Andreas (RtW1/WIR2)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I know, no satellite channel can broadcast original audiotrack due
> to licensing problems. When broadcasted via cable, distribution can be
> controlled and respective license fees are paid. V
On 13 Jun 2001 14:12:08 UT, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using DVB 0.82 + VDR 0.72.
>
> I dont plan to upgrade next time.
>
I have modified VDR 0.72 to never delete recordings with priority 99 and
a name starting with '%'. Look at recording.c
if (Recordings.Load(false)) {
Hi,
yesterday I put 5 DVB-s cards into one PC (MSI K7T with 6 PCI slots). I
also changed MAX_NUM_DVB to 5 in the DVB driver. The driver recognizes
and loads 5 DVB cards but after printing the message the whole system
just freezes and the only thing that can be done is to do a reset.
I have also c
Hi,
>
> What would be the best way to enable 16:9 Output?
I asked this question already one month ago but didn't get any answer.
:( I tried it with the ioctl VIDIOCSASPECTRATIO from VDR but had no
success.
> Secondly trying to change the driver to treat 16:9
> the same as a 4:3.
This should w
On Thu, 31 May 2001 09:49:28 +0200, "Nils Heidorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I wonder if the firmware guys could teach this to the DSP (?!?) in the DVB
> Card too ...
This has been discussed to death already here. Just look back in the
archive.
The problem ist hardware and not software. The
Hi,
here are another ideas which probably solve the conflict:
As I understood the problem with memory appears during recording and
only during recording. The OSD is used only during normal viewing and
playback.
So I see two possible solutions:
1. Systems using only one card
During recording the
On Tue, 22 May 2001 23:22:17 +0200, Klaus Schmidinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe that both fields add useful functionality and don't want to drop
> either of them. Somehow I like the idea of being able to set a guranteed
> lifetime, no matter what else might happen.
Yes, I use this f
56 matches
Mail list logo
