Hi,
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 01:01:31PM +0200, Felix Domke wrote:
[...]
> I don't know if broadcasters are required to send non-inverted signals.
> I just know (read: remember) that some do. I might be wrong, so second
> opinions are welcome.
sorry for the delay...
Finally I checked again and it
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 10:30:50AM +0200, Thierry Lelegard wrote:
>
> > I think there is at least one usage case where one might want to
> > have the DekTec card integrated into the linux-dvb driver framework,
> > which already has been mentioned: us the existing linux-dvb applications
> > with it
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 04:42:20PM +0200, Thierry Lelegard wrote:
> IMHO, the Linux DVB framework serves two main purposes:
> - Common API for the zillions of DVB-S/C/T adapters
> - Common frontend for TV watching programs such as Myth et al.
>
> Dektec products address the market of professi
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 04:18:31PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
> Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> >
> >> 1) LNB drift
> >
> > - LNBs have a constant error plus a temperature drift
> > (e.g. +/-1MHz error, +/-3Mhz drift for a temperature range
> > of -40 ... +60 °C -- cheap no name equipment u
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:35:31PM +0200, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
>
> I don't understand your conclusion.
sorry, probably my wording was all wrong.
> Try this doc
> http://www.dvb.org/(RoxenUserID=cc5cd761bc596bbccaf4820a0a017e74)/technology/fact_sheets/WP01_DVB-T%20Hierarchical.pdf
>
>
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 05:33:43PM +0200, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Wolfgang Wegner wrote:
>
> > just a stupid question:
> > How is a frontend supposed to handle that anyways?
> > The demods I know about only have one transport stream output,
Hi Patrick,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 04:36:33PM +0200, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> And even if they would be hierarchically transmitted, it would not be
> possible to receive them: The LinuxTV API as of today is not capable of
> selecting either the high-priority stream or the low-p
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:26:13PM +0200, Georg Acher wrote:
> The Reelbox (with the 300MHz) has up to 4 tuners, the NetCeiver can have up
> to 6 tuners (max 40Mbyte/s input rate). I did a lot of profiling
> (oprofile/gprof) on the Geode, so I think I know what multi demods can "do"
> with the syst
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:17:19PM +0200, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007, Manu Abraham wrote:
> >
> > If you would like to fix that in V3, i would much appreciate. If you
> > would just like to keep talking only, maybe lets then not talk too much
> > about it.
>
> The recording
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 06:02:50PM +0200, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2007, Wolfgang Wegner wrote:
> >
> > - dvb_fe_type: DVB-S2 is missing and I personally would also like
> > to see ASI here...
>
> See my other mail, IMHO we should add the ASI de
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:38:12PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
>
> Right.
>
> Do you think we can generalize it to a DUMMY frontend where some fields
> are just queried ?
>
> If so it would be a matter of just defining a "dummy name" for the
> general category of headless devices where some stati
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 02:57:32PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
> CityK wrote:
> > Its described in:
> >
> > "/EN 50083-9:2002 : //Cable networks for television signals, sound
> > signals and interactive services. Part 9: Interfaces for CATV/SMATV
> > head-ends and similar professional equipment fo
Hi Manu,
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 02:17:55AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
> Please don't remove the CC's. The CC'd people generally don't bother
> about mails from the ML, probably.
sorry, it was definitely not my intention and I hope to include
all previous CC here.
[have to read about the multipr
Hi,
how should this discussion take place?
Up to now, my personal experience showed only some drawbacks in the
frontend API, and reading the current proposal v4_0.3 I have some
comments/questions concerning this part:
- dvb_fe_type: DVB-S2 is missing and I personally would also like
to see ASI
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 08:33:05PM +0900, timecop wrote:
> Good job deleting the only relevant portion of my post.
Sorry it was a bit difficult to see which should have been relevant
because every second word was "f***".
"P. van Gaans" I do not know what you mean - my clock is set correctly.
As
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 08:01:10PM +0900, timecop wrote:
> On 8/1/07, Luca Olivetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > En/na [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha escrit:
> Stop fucking replying to my mail in foreign language. I don't give a
> shit your mail client shows up in greek, have common courtesy not to
> injec
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 03:08:23PM +0200, Luca Olivetti wrote:
> En/na Morgan Tørvolt ha escrit:
>
> > your real problem is not the quality part of this equation really. It
> > is the fact that all drivers implement this differently.
>
> That's not surprising, since the current api specificat
Hi Morgan,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 12:04:51PM +0200, Morgan T?rvolt wrote:
[...]
> your real problem is not the quality part of this equation really. It
> is the fact that all drivers implement this differently. A level of
> 0x2a35 on snr could mean perfect signal on one driver, and no
> reception
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 06:30:03PM -0400, manu wrote:
> Le 23.02.2007 10:45:31, Wolfgang Wegner a écrit :
[...]
> >This depends on the CAM, the CI stack you use and what streams you
> >want to decrypt of each programme.
> >Alphacrypt and Cryptoworks can at least decrypt two
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:03:37PM +0100, Rudy Zijlstra wrote:
> manu wrote:
> >Le 23.02.2007 08:07:44, Nick Tannenberg a écrit :
> >>Hi gurus, I've two questions for you.
> >>
> >>1. Could you point me to a DVB-S hardware supports external CAM
> >> modules that is 100% working with Linux. Just t
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:13:45PM +, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 01:28 +, MichaeL wrote:
> >
> > how can i add support for this board in the driver.
>
> Does this set top box have a hard drive? How do you boot linux on it?
As far as I can see from the pictures, it has a
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:59:46PM +, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 16:45 +0100, Wolfgang Wegner wrote:
> > The more difficult part is to synchronize the playback part (audio
> > sample
> > clock and video clock (frame rate)) to this new system clock - this
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 04:07:13PM +0100, Marco Masotti wrote:
> > ==
> > Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 15:25:05 +0100
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wolfgang Wegner)
> > To: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
> > Subject: Re:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:10:48PM +0100, Marco Masotti wrote:
> > ==
> > Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:53:27 +0100
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wolfgang Wegner)
> > To: Benny Amorsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
&
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:36:07PM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> > "KS" == Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> KS> The whole HDTV thing is of no interest to me until there is a DVB
> KS> card that can actually replay HDTV in hardware.
>
> Why would it have to be the DVB card doi
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 10:26:06AM +0200, thomas schorpp wrote:
> Jason Filos wrote:
> >It CAN be, infact STB0899 has 242 registers ...
>
> registers or adress space? are you sure?
AFAIR it has around 150 registers, many of them 16 or 32 Bit in size.
> >But there is already a DVB driver for the
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 02:00:28PM +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
[...]
> the (hardcoded) firmware version in tda1004x_check_upload_ok is quite
> useless IMHO.
I agree with you that a hardcoded comparison is not a good solution.
However, especially in case of problems with the driver
Hi Robert,
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 01:11:55AM +0200, Robert Schlabbach wrote:
> FWIW, all the TechnoTrend DLLs I have seen so far (including the latest
> 2.17d one) contained firmware version _0x2C_ for the TDA10045H. Is there
sorry, I was mistaken here.
I was talking about TDA10046, never had a fr
Hi Luke,
in case you really want to use a newer firmware (Version 0x26 is the
newest I am aware of - unfortunately I do not know if it can be found
in any driver yet), you also have to take care of dspVersion in
the driver.
Regards,
Wolfgang
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 09:47:31PM +0200, Robert Schlabbach wrote:
> From: "Wolfgang Wegner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Furthermore, percentage readings are only one possibility.
> The _only_ possibility, I'd say.
hmm... :)
>
> > For comparison, dBµV od
Hi Robert,
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 08:08:00PM +0200, Robert Schlabbach wrote:
[...]
> To implement percentage readings, you would have to change _all_ frontend
> modules and figure out the hardware-specific ranges, and you would probably
> need to have all hardware available for analysis to do this
Hi,
just wanted to ask if the TDA10046 is working now - in the source code
as of linuxtv-dvb-1.1.1 support seems quite reasonable, however the last
mailing list entry states it does not work yet.
One thing I do not understand: firmware seems to be loaded in chunks,
which did _never_ work for me. (
-
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 00:42:29 -0800
To: Wolfgang Wegner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: FlexCop Information?
Hi!
At this point we only support Linux in embedded applications.
We plan to have a Linux driver f
Hi,
sorry for this (maybe) FAQ, but I cannot access the archives at the
moment...
I studied the dvbapi to find out if I can get the unmodified TS from
the frontend, but did not really find an answer. Is there anybody
able and willing to give a short answer wether this is possible or not? :)
I a
34 matches
Mail list logo
