On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:51:32 PST, Eric Anopolsky said:
> their own kernels in the first place. IMHO, it's reasonable to expect
> the small minority of Linux users who want to compile their own kernels
> to learn that "EXPERIMENTAL" means something.
And what, exactly, does it mean, given that ther
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jan 03, 2008 14:10 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> @@ -1732,17 +1735,19 @@ static void ext4_mb_scan_aligned(struct
>> +/* find first stripe-aligned block in group */
>> +a = e4b->bd_group * EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb)
>> + le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first
Hello,
Ok this is the reworked patch which implements both of your suggestions.
Whenever a size is passed to resize2fs that is too small for the fs the minimum
size is spat out. Thanks much,
Josef
diff --git a/resize/main.c b/resize/main.c
index 7c1d0c1..a9653ee 100644
--- a/resize/main.c
+++
On Jan 03, 2008 14:10 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> @@ -1732,17 +1735,19 @@ static void ext4_mb_scan_aligned(struct
> + /* find first stripe-aligned block in group */
> + a = e4b->bd_group * EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb)
> + le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block);
> + a +
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 03:16:59PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> People wishing to make live usb disks and such are looking for a way
>> to get the minimum resize size for an ext fs in blocks so that they
>> can just resize their image to that size and do with it w
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:21:01PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 03:16:59PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > People wishing to make live usb disks and such are looking for a way
> > to get the minimum resize size for an ext fs in blocks so that they
> > can just
3rd time's the charm I hope!
-
I ran into a potential overflow in ext4_mb_scan_aligned,
and went looking for others in mballoc. This patch hits a
few spots, compile-tested only at this point, comments welcome.
This patch:
changes fe_len to an int, I don't think we need it to be a
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jan 02, 2008 14:01 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> This patch:
>>
>> changes fe_len to an int, I don't think we need it to be a long,
>> looking at how it's used (should it be a grpblk_t?) Also change
>> anything assigned to return value of mb_find_extent, since it return
On Jan 02, 2008 14:01 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> This patch:
>
> changes fe_len to an int, I don't think we need it to be a long,
> looking at how it's used (should it be a grpblk_t?) Also change
> anything assigned to return value of mb_find_extent, since it returns
> fe_len.
>
> changes any
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 03:16:59PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> People wishing to make live usb disks and such are looking for a way
> to get the minimum resize size for an ext fs in blocks so that they
> can just resize their image to that size and do with it what they
> will. This pat
10 matches
Mail list logo
