On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 10:04:04PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:22:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:02:08 +0100
> > > Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Fix ext4 bitops.
> > >
Hi Pavel
> > > As user pages are always in highmem, this should be easy to decide:
> > > only send SIGDANGER when highmem is full. (Yes, there are
> > > inodes/dentries/file descriptors in lowmem, but I doubt apps will
> > > respond to SIGDANGER by closing files).
> >
> > Good point; for a system
The patch titled
disable-ext4
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
disable-ext4.patch
This patch was dropped because it is obsolete
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
--
Subje
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 12:18:35 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The patch titled
> disable-ext4
> has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
> disable-ext4.patch
I dropped the entire ext4 patch series, because the newly-added
convert-to-iget_locked patch has wrecked the iget
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:25:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> When I merge David's iget coversion patches this will instead wreck the
> ext4 patchset.
That's ok, it shouldn't be hard for me to fix this up. How quickly
will you be able to merge David's iget converstion patches? Could
this get
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:36:26 -0500 Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:25:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > When I merge David's iget coversion patches this will instead wreck the
> > ext4 patchset.
>
> That's ok, it shouldn't be hard for me to fix this up. How
The patch titled
pagecache-zeroing-zero_user_segment-zero_user_segments-and-zero_user-fix-2
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
pagecache-zeroing-zero_user_segment-zero_user_segments-and-zero_user-fix-2.patch
This patch was dropped because it was folded into
pagecach
The patch titled
pagecache-zeroing-zero_user_segment-zero_user_segments-and-zero_user-fix
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
pagecache-zeroing-zero_user_segment-zero_user_segments-and-zero_user-fix.patch
This patch was dropped because it was folded into
pagecache-ze
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 01:39:02PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 10:04:04PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:22:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:02:08 +0100
> > > > B
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:42:07PM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> * Eric Sesterhenn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > while running a modified version of fsfuzzer i triggered the BUG() in
> > ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(). Sadly I am not able to reproduce this using
> > the generated image,
Repoted by Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The Coverity checker spotted the following NULL dereference:
static int ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used
{
...
if (!bitmap_bh)
goto out_err;
...
out_err:
sb->s_dirt = 1;
put_bh(bitmap_bh);
...
11 matches
Mail list logo