Re: [PATCH] Fix ext4 bitops

2008-02-03 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 10:04:04PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:22:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:02:08 +0100 > > > Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Fix ext4 bitops. > > >

Re: [RFC] Parallelize IO for e2fsck

2008-02-03 Thread KOSAKI Motohiro
Hi Pavel > > > As user pages are always in highmem, this should be easy to decide: > > > only send SIGDANGER when highmem is full. (Yes, there are > > > inodes/dentries/file descriptors in lowmem, but I doubt apps will > > > respond to SIGDANGER by closing files). > > > > Good point; for a system

- disable-ext4.patch removed from -mm tree

2008-02-03 Thread akpm
The patch titled disable-ext4 has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was disable-ext4.patch This patch was dropped because it is obsolete The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ -- Subje

Re: - disable-ext4.patch removed from -mm tree

2008-02-03 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 12:18:35 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The patch titled > disable-ext4 > has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was > disable-ext4.patch I dropped the entire ext4 patch series, because the newly-added convert-to-iget_locked patch has wrecked the iget

Re: - disable-ext4.patch removed from -mm tree

2008-02-03 Thread Theodore Tso
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:25:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > When I merge David's iget coversion patches this will instead wreck the > ext4 patchset. That's ok, it shouldn't be hard for me to fix this up. How quickly will you be able to merge David's iget converstion patches? Could this get

Re: - disable-ext4.patch removed from -mm tree

2008-02-03 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:36:26 -0500 Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:25:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > When I merge David's iget coversion patches this will instead wreck the > > ext4 patchset. > > That's ok, it shouldn't be hard for me to fix this up. How

- pagecache-zeroing-zero_user_segment-zero_user_segments-and-zero_user-fix-2.patch removed from -mm tree

2008-02-03 Thread akpm
The patch titled pagecache-zeroing-zero_user_segment-zero_user_segments-and-zero_user-fix-2 has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was pagecache-zeroing-zero_user_segment-zero_user_segments-and-zero_user-fix-2.patch This patch was dropped because it was folded into pagecach

- pagecache-zeroing-zero_user_segment-zero_user_segments-and-zero_user-fix.patch removed from -mm tree

2008-02-03 Thread akpm
The patch titled pagecache-zeroing-zero_user_segment-zero_user_segments-and-zero_user-fix has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was pagecache-zeroing-zero_user_segment-zero_user_segments-and-zero_user-fix.patch This patch was dropped because it was folded into pagecache-ze

Re: [PATCH] Fix ext4 bitops

2008-02-03 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 01:39:02PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 10:04:04PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:22:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:02:08 +0100 > > > > B

Re: BUG_ON at mballoc.c:3752

2008-02-03 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:42:07PM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote: > * Eric Sesterhenn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > hi, > > > > while running a modified version of fsfuzzer i triggered the BUG() in > > ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(). Sadly I am not able to reproduce this using > > the generated image,

[PATCH] ext4: Fix Null dereference.

2008-02-03 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
Repoted by Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The Coverity checker spotted the following NULL dereference: static int ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used { ... if (!bitmap_bh) goto out_err; ... out_err: sb->s_dirt = 1; put_bh(bitmap_bh); ...