On Di, Feb 22, 2005 at 04:40:35PM +0100, Matthias Lechner wrote:
> Thanks a lot!
> that solved the problem!
>
> but why does fai use this "kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386"-entry instead of
> "kernel-image-2.4-386", which would be much easier?
> regards
> mat
>
Hi,
I guess 'man make-kpkg' gives you an
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:40:35 +0100, Matthias Lechner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> Thanks a lot!
> that solved the problem!
> but why does fai use this "kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386"-entry instead of
"kernel-image-2.4-386", which would be much easier?
This "meta" package did
Thanks a lot!
that solved the problem!
but why does fai use this "kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386"-entry instead of
"kernel-image-2.4-386", which would be much easier?
regards
mat
Am 16:00 22.02.05 +0100 schrieb Alexander Bugl:
>Hi!
>
>> after rebooting grub is trying to boot the default entry, but fa
Hi!
> after rebooting grub is trying to boot the default entry, but fails with
> error
> message "Error 1 - File name must by either an absolute pathname or
> blocklist".
> error.log tells me the following:
> shell.log:E: Couldn't find package kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386
> shell.log:ls: vmlinuz-*
hi!
got the problem with fai 2.6.6 fixed by uncommenting the line mentioned by
jimmy.
now the (DEMO-)installation runs through, partitioning the HD, installing
packages etc. at the end it ells me that some errors occured in error.log.
then the usual message ("hit enter to reboot") appears.
