We've been using FAI for quite a while now and we're attempting to step
up from FAI v3.1 to v3.2.4. Most everything is working for us except ...
the ISO built by fai-cd is not quite organized properly. It is a
bootable CD (/boot exists and contains an kernel and grub). The rest of
the root file
n mounting the
root filesystem. The fai-cd does ...
Russel Hill wrote:
We've been using FAI for quite a while now and we're attempting to step
up from FAI v3.1 to v3.2.4. Most everything is working for us except ...
the ISO built by fai-cd is not quite organized properly. It is a
e:
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 11:46 -0700, Russel Hill wrote:
I know ... I'm replying to my own message. Since trying our build, we've
downloaded and booted the fai-cd example. It's organized in exactly the
same manner (and works). I guess I should probably read up a bit ...
One thing,
Russel Hill wrote:
Henning Sprang wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 11:46 -0700, Russel Hill wrote:
I know ... I'm replying to my own message. Since trying our build,
we've downloaded and booted the fai-cd example. It's organized in
exactly the same manner (and works). I guess I
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
[...]
At this point it boots to an '(initramfs)' prompt without the long timeout.
/live.log says (something like):
mount: Mounting root filesystem on /root failed: No such device
/root has nothing in it or mounted on it.
/live/image/live/filesystem.dir/ has what I exp
Good news. I had missed a change in NFSROOT (unionfs-modules). Silly me.
Thanks for your patience and advice.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Thomas Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:56:56 +0100, Frédéric BOITEUX <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> FAI is now bas
We are building using fai-cd from a private package pool (a local subset
of debian packages). Ordinarily, we build our private package pool by
first building an ISO from more complete debian mirror. Then we
post-process the access logs and built our private package pool from
that list of packag
Andreas Sindermann wrote:
[snip...]
Perhaps in your package_config files you install with 'aptitude -r'
instead of simple aptitude?
I only use 'install'.
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Andreas Sindermann wrote:
[snip...]
Perhaps in your package_config files you install with 'aptitude -r'
instead of simple aptitude?
I only use 'install'.
Which distro are you using? Is it lenny or etch?
lenny
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Michael Tautschnig <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> >>> Andreas Sindermann wrote:
> >>>
> >>> [snip...]
> >>>
> Perhaps in your package_config files you install with 'aptitude -r'
> instead of simple aptitude?
> >>> I only use '
10 matches
Mail list logo
