> Hi,
>
> On Monday 10 July 2006 13:12, Henning Sprang wrote:
> > Things for which the rules in Debian are set for etch should really be
> > fixed as soon as possible - if there's a final decision in Debian for
> > which FHS version to go, then the bug should be handled.
>
> As written in my mail
Hi,
On Monday 10 July 2006 13:12, Henning Sprang wrote:
> Things for which the rules in Debian are set for etch should really be
> fixed as soon as possible - if there's a final decision in Debian for
> which FHS version to go, then the bug should be handled.
As written in my mail which started t
[...]
>
> > If you'd fix them before the developer weekend, we could use the
> weekend to
> > test the changes and spend energy on useful stuff.
> Shouldn't we test the changes before an upload? Or do you mean "fix
> those bugs, but do not upload yet"?
>
[...]
I don't know about your
On 7/10/06, Thomas Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 03:03:55 +0200, Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> are more than three years known. Thomas, I would really really really be
> happy if you fix these simply bugs _before_ the developer
> weekend.
If
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 03:03:55 +0200, Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> are more than three years known. Thomas, I would really really really be
> happy if you fix these simply bugs _before_ the developer
> weekend.
If anyone else think I should fix this _now_, ple
Hi,
On Monday 10 July 2006 09:21, you wrote:
> I'm a bit unsure who "you" is here; the FAI developers or me. :-)
the former :) I only cc:ed you for the part I addressed at you in the mail.
I hope you got the points I raised there...
Thanks for your offer for another NMU, but Thomas is active, s
unblock 340608 by 212434
unblock 340608 by 230217
unblock 340608 by 344158
unblock 311524 by 212434
unblock 311524 by 230217
unblock 311524 by 344158
unblock 315080 by 212434
unblock 315080 by 230217
unblock 315080 by 344158
unblock 336650 by 212434
unblock 336650 by 230217
unblock 336650 b
